![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2003
25×11 Posts |
I have noticed in the past that when I submit factors that have been found (trial factoring or P-1) through the manual pages, the server always says "Insufficient information for accurate CPU credit." For trial factoring, it seem to do OK assigning credit, but for P-1 it always assumes the factor was found in Stage #1 with B1=800000, even though the result that I send has the true information. Can someone explain this?
Today I had an even stranger thing happen, a P-1 factor was credited as a trial factor. Here are the lines from the results.txt file: Code:
[Tue Dec 01 13:56:58 2009] P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=605000, B2=17393750. UID: 1997rj7/compq, M51200911 has a factor: 390126913731778984073, AID: F16547D743B533B97C9EBCA541EFDDF8 Code:
Factors found: 1 Processing result: M51200911 has a factor: 390126913731778984073, AID: F16547D743B533B97C9EBCA541EFDDF8 Insufficient information for accurate CPU credit. For stats purposes, assuming factor was found by trial factoring using prime95. CPU credit is 1.0510 GHz-days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
11110000011002 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
2·3·281 Posts |
Quote:
Jacob |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Suspect result | stebbo | PrimeNet | 23 | 2017-06-03 11:14 |
| Odd result | swellman | YAFU | 15 | 2016-02-25 00:38 |
| What does my result mean? | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 6 | 2013-04-16 21:52 |
| strange GMP-ECM result | yoyo | GMP-ECM | 1 | 2009-08-08 07:09 |
| New Result | R.D. Silverman | NFSNET Discussion | 1 | 2005-04-19 23:45 |