![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
64110 Posts |
Not so much a puzzle, more of a thought experiment:
The rough idea: How long would it take to build a modern device from raw materials, without any current technology? The more precise version: Imagine an astronaut has crash landed on an Earth-like planet and all that remains from the ship is an audio CD containing the next steps of his mission, but he has no way of playing it and needs to build a CD player. Assume that all raw materials are available and nearby, but he has absolutely no tools. How long would it take him to build something that could play the CD (or otherwise extract the information and convey it to him in a useful fashion)? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
2·3·587 Posts |
That astronaut had better be inhumanly dedicated to his mission. I think a more useful application for the CD would be to break it into pieces, attach the pieces to strings, and hang them outside the door to a makeshift hut to help keep the indiginous popluation of the planet from eating him by distracting them with the diffracted light.
Otherwise he needs to start by considering how to construct a 780 nm wavelength laser using a pile of unprocessed silicon, boron, and antimony. He would need to construct envionmentally controlled processing facilities and laboratory instrumentation, each of which in turn require a huge amount of infrastruction which he would have to fabricate. Is there a simpler way? A magnifying glass, a steady hand, and a few million spare hours to manually record the pattern of pits and translate the resulting encoded binary sequence into raw data. The raw data itself might encode lists of frequencies and amplitudes, which he would then need to manually decode into speech. I don't think this can be done in a single lifetime, so he better hope Eve the astronaut came with him. Last fiddled with by bsquared on 2009-11-13 at 17:23 Reason: more speculation... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jan 2009
Ireland
101110102 Posts |
i think you could start with something easier. i couldnt imagine it being completed in an average lifetime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
10100000012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Jan 2009
Ireland
BA16 Posts |
depends on they previous education of the person in question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
Quote:
but I arrived in this hell-hole (Milton Keynes) because I was asked about error-correction while I was programming games at some outfit in Lowestoft. I went to the bookshop at the world-famous "UEA" and found three good books (second-hand) on "discrete mathematics". One of them was both entertaining and told me what I needed to know about Galois Fields. I got the job, and a year or so later, Martin Brennan (a sort of whizz kid who had worked with Sir Clive Sinclair on the QL) interviewed me with the idea of writing much of a CD player in software. He explained that he had designed the hardware that could multiply in the (2^8-1) field, but dividing was more time consuming. I told him that I used logs, got the job, and together we designed a customized chip. Await the next thrilling installment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
13·151 Posts |
If one had a good microscope, knew the coding system, and disc layout, reading it may be possible. It would take a lot of patience, time, paper, and pencils.
Not me. After 30 minutes, I'd be done for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
984410 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
2·3·587 Posts |
If I understand it correctly there are something like 6 billion features (pits or lands) to distinguish on a full capacity CD. Assuming you could examine, write down, and move to the next feature once per second this would take 190 years of continual examination to do by hand (neglecting the time it takes to blow the glass and forge the steel in the right shape to be able to magnify to the point of distinguishing something 1 micron square... oh, and create either an electrical generator or a 200 year supply of candles... otherwise one would have to only work during the day). It might be faster to beget a few generations of helpers and build the infrastructure to be able to create a laser, photodiode, microprocessor, amplifier, and speaker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
2·3·587 Posts |
Quote:
![]() p.s. nice puzzle... this is fun! Last fiddled with by bsquared on 2009-11-13 at 22:17 Reason: p.s. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Göogle's AlphaGo AI is playing Lee Sedol (~ the best human Go player) | Dubslow | Hobbies | 11 | 2016-06-02 12:29 |
| Scratch challenge! | Xyzzy | Programming | 31 | 2012-06-01 19:01 |
| Cat scratch! | mfgoode | Science & Technology | 0 | 2007-06-08 09:05 |
| JavaScript for 2-player interactive game-playing? | ewmayer | Programming | 2 | 2006-02-04 19:22 |
| The Program Seems to Start from Scratch Each Time I Load it | JackMama | Software | 13 | 2002-12-20 14:17 |