![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
23×13×23 Posts |
I know that sometimes testing numbers like M<insert 15 digit prime here> takes years. Yet, some people like Ernst Mayer (Ewmayer) have been able to find factors within minutes. Would this be useful in filtering out exponents know to yield composite numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
Yes. Putting a certain amount of effort into trying to factor a Mersenne number, before running the L-L test on that number, has always been a part of GIMPS. The GIMPS database keeps a record of how far each Mnumber with a prime exponent has been trial-factored and how high the limits have been tried for P-1 factoring that Mnumber.
Mnumbers for which a factor is found are removed from the list of those eligible for L-L testing (first-time or double-check) assignment. PrimeNet factoring assignments are for trial-factoring Mnumbers before they're assigned for L-L testing. Tradeoff limits are calculated for trial factoring and P-1 factoring. Tradeoff limits are the limits at which (the time spent factoring) divided by (the probability of finding a factor) equals the time required for L-L testing. Below that limit, time spent trying to find a factor is more valuable than time spent L-L testing. Then when a Mnumber is assigned for trial factoring, Prime95 performs as much trial factoring as is required to go up to the tradeoff limit. When a Mnumber is assigned for L-L testing, Prime95 checks whether it has had P-1 factoring attempted on it, and if not then Prime95 performs P-1 factoring up to the tradeoff limit before starting the L-L test. BTW, only Mnumbers with prime exponents are assigned by GIMPS for factoring and L-L testing, because it is known that all Mnumbers with composite expoments must have proper factors and thus cannot be prime themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Aug 2002
Portland, OR USA
2×137 Posts |
Quote:
Having said that -- E.Mayer and others have logged very impressive factor lists of mersenne numbers with both prime and composite exponents. They have fine-tuned the process to an amazing level of efficiency - so that whatever catagory of target they focus on usually falls quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×53×71 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A (new) old, (faster) slower mersenne-(primality) PRP test | boldi | Miscellaneous Math | 74 | 2014-04-17 07:16 |
| Faster LL-test Bounty Questions | __HRB__ | Information & Answers | 6 | 2009-10-04 19:37 |
| Double check LL test faster than first run test | lidocorc | Software | 3 | 2008-12-03 15:12 |
| to be faster at searching mersenne primes | flosculus | Information & Answers | 6 | 2008-11-10 18:59 |
| A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ? | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2004-10-26 21:37 |