mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-11-26, 13:24   #67
ldesnogu
 
ldesnogu's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
France

22616 Posts
Default

And take care: these 1156/1366 sockets are very fragile. I know of at least two people who had some broken pins; I'm one of them, though it was probably the board that was DoA (I can't be sure as I didn't inspect it close enough before inserting the CPU).
ldesnogu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-26, 14:42   #68
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3×5×313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
This is certainly not so. The CPU's do not have holes for the pins of the sockets to engage. What happens is that the pins of the socket mark the contact pads of the CPU. See for instance the pictures on AnandTech.

Jacob
Yes this would be what I saw ... not exactly "covered" but lots of gold foil none-the-less.

Thanks

My current issue is since the MB only has 1 IDE and I need to connect a CD and HD I am having trouble finding appropriate bays close enough together that the IDE cable reaches between them. I am hoping I can buy a longer one???
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-26, 17:52   #69
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

141518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
My current issue is since the MB only has 1 IDE and I need to connect a CD and HD I am having trouble finding appropriate bays close enough together that the IDE cable reaches between them. I am hoping I can buy a longer one???
Yes, often the IDE cables that come with motherboards aren't quite big enough to span some of the larger cases popular today for homebuilt computers. I had a similar problem when I was building my computer, and was able to get a bigger one at a local computer store. (If that fails, I'm sure Newegg's got them in all shapes and sizes.)
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 03:00   #70
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

469510 Posts
Default HELP!!!

Just set up and powered on the new i750 system and after MB startup and when it tries to start the OS I get this error almost immediately. I had to video tape it to get the error because it flashed on and cleared almost immediately. On the video I noticed the XP logo screen flash for the slightest instant; not even long enough to be bright.

It's not a new hard drive and I obviously cannot scan for viruses for as far as it gets. Not sure if the error message will help.

Thanks
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Help.jpg
Views:	125
Size:	50.0 KB
ID:	4344  
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 05:00   #71
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

141518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
Just set up and powered on the new i750 system and after MB startup and when it tries to start the OS I get this error almost immediately. I had to video tape it to get the error because it flashed on and cleared almost immediately. On the video I noticed the XP logo screen flash for the slightest instant; not even long enough to be bright.

It's not a new hard drive and I obviously cannot scan for viruses for as far as it gets. Not sure if the error message will help.

Thanks
Quick question: was this OS installation done on this motherboard, or is it left intact from another mobo? If the latter, then you'll need to do a clean install on the new one. Windows doesn't take too kindly to having its IDE controller change on it midstream, and there's no way to make it roll with it without starting over. (Linux, BTW, has no problem with this; I learned that the hard way when I upgraded my computer from a P4 to a C2D and had one half of my dual-boot setup suddenly not work.)
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 05:52   #72
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3·5·313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Quick question: was this OS installation done on this motherboard, or is it left intact from another mobo? If the latter, then you'll need to do a clean install on the new one. Windows doesn't take too kindly to having its IDE controller change on it midstream, and there's no way to make it roll with it without starting over. (Linux, BTW, has no problem with this; I learned that the hard way when I upgraded my computer from a P4 to a C2D and had one half of my dual-boot setup suddenly not work.)
Thanks...I think that was it. I looked up the error message and among many other ideas was this IDE controller mismatch from nwe HW. So yes I installed a new OS and all looks good so far. Thanks.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 14:49   #73
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3×5×313 Posts
Default THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU

to everyone who offered me advice and help over the last few weeks for my daring adventure. IT WORKS!!!!

petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 15:29   #74
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

1010110011002 Posts
Default It's Alive!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xos2M...eature=related
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 16:05   #75
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

111278 Posts
Default First Benchmark...

First benchmark...Stock; Q9550 for comparison (i5 is about 5% faster)

Code:
CPU Model	Program                    	Speed	(1024K)	(1280K)	(1536K)	(1792K)	(2048K)	(2560K)	(3072K)	(3584K)	(4096K)
i5-750		Windows64,Prime95,v25.9,build 4	2664	15.98	20.18	24.28	29.39	33.45	44.55	54.51	66.16	74.58
Q9550		Windows64,Prime95,v25.9,build 4	2832	16.97	21.72	26.31	32.09	35.4	47.01	56.63	69.05	77.44
P.S. It shows 20.18 for 1280FFT. I am getting 24 ms running all 4 cores.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 16:07   #76
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22·691 Posts
Default

I was getting 24.53 with all four cores loaded at stock. Now I am getting 17.6 at 1280K with all cores loaded running at 3800 with memory at 1520/9-9-9. Enjoy the overclocking process.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-27, 16:12   #77
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3·5·313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
I was getting 24.53 with all four cores loaded at stock. Now I am getting 17.6 at 1280K with all cores loaded running at 3800 with memory at 1520/9-9-9. Enjoy the overclocking process.
Interesting that you didn't experience a slowdown as your benchmark (for 1 CPU) and loaded 4 CPUS are the same time.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's the algorithm for deciding in which base to express the post count? jasong Forum Feedback 9 2016-11-08 02:22
Athlon II 620 x4 henryzz Hardware 5 2009-10-28 03:25
Deciding squarefree numbers Jushi Math 4 2006-03-30 13:56
Athlon 64 ThomRuley Hardware 7 2003-09-28 13:31
Athlon vs. P4 ThomRuley Lone Mersenne Hunters 1 2003-07-11 23:15

All times are UTC. The time now is 06:29.


Fri Aug 6 06:29:13 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 58 mins, 1 user, load averages: 2.56, 2.60, 2.67

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.