![]() |
|
|
#2828 |
|
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany
5×223 Posts |
CUDALucas 2.06, CUDA 11.1.1, Quick&Dirty run, did a "./CUDALucas -cufftbench 2048 32768 20" before the following runs on each GPU.
Oliver |
|
|
|
|
|
#2829 |
|
Jun 2003
23·683 Posts |
Those are impressive numbers from A100. I suspect these would be even more impressive if gpuOWL was used - is that something you can test out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2830 |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
70610 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2831 |
|
Jun 2003
23·683 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2832 |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
2·353 Posts |
but CudaLucas without proofs.....
Last fiddled with by moebius on 2020-11-01 at 03:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2833 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
172208 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Don't DC/LL them with CudaLucas | LaurV | Data | 131 | 2017-05-02 18:41 |
| CUDALucas / cuFFT Performance on CUDA 7 / 7.5 / 8 | Brain | GPU Computing | 13 | 2016-02-19 15:53 |
| CUDALucas: which binary to use? | Karl M Johnson | GPU Computing | 15 | 2015-10-13 04:44 |
| settings for cudaLucas | fairsky | GPU Computing | 11 | 2013-11-03 02:08 |
| Trying to run CUDALucas on Windows 8 CP | Rodrigo | GPU Computing | 12 | 2012-03-07 23:20 |