![]() |
|
|
#2817 | |
|
Feb 2008
Meath, Ireland
5×37 Posts |
Quote:
I don't think mine has any anomalies, but I'm not sure if I'm reading the threads benchmarking correctly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2818 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
782410 Posts |
Quote:
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...82&postcount=4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2819 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
41×251 Posts |
we need now two bytes to store the page numbers of this thread....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2820 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
24×3×163 Posts |
Laurv you're at least a dozen posts late. What's wrong with a Fermat number of pages?
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-10-09 at 20:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2821 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
1029110 Posts |
Nope, not late, there's no page zero, so pages 1 to 256 can be stored in one byte
![]() Nothing wrong with a Fermat prime number of pages, it just didn't cross my mind... I am thinking in binary, more than I am a number theorist. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2822 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
24×3×163 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2823 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
1E9016 Posts |
There's no known lossless data compression capable of even storing your comment from which that quote comes, in one byte, much less a page or multiple pages of this thread. (I get you meant page numbering, but that's not what you wrote there. And the page numbering is not zero-based.)
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-10-13 at 17:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2824 |
|
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
195410 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2825 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
24×3×163 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2826 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
24×3×163 Posts |
Quote:
https://www.amazon.com/Engineer-Not-Arguing-Funny-Engineering/dp/B07KW1YRK3/ No I don't have the tshirt. Yet. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/641763015624423294/ Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-10-13 at 17:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2827 |
|
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhäuser Gate
3×269 Posts |
While examining the CudaLucas source, I noticed that it has the ability to display the relative amount of time spent in the 4 main routines while running a benckmark. Can someone enlighten me how to do thi?. It doesn't seem to be in any documentation.
TIA |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Don't DC/LL them with CudaLucas | LaurV | Data | 131 | 2017-05-02 18:41 |
| CUDALucas / cuFFT Performance on CUDA 7 / 7.5 / 8 | Brain | GPU Computing | 13 | 2016-02-19 15:53 |
| CUDALucas: which binary to use? | Karl M Johnson | GPU Computing | 15 | 2015-10-13 04:44 |
| settings for cudaLucas | fairsky | GPU Computing | 11 | 2013-11-03 02:08 |
| Trying to run CUDALucas on Windows 8 CP | Rodrigo | GPU Computing | 12 | 2012-03-07 23:20 |