mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-06-11, 21:39   #1937
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

1,123 Posts
Default

All, been out of the loop for a while. We just about settled in FL. I would like to get Carl's, et al, updates incorporated and working. Sourceforge has 2.04b, but I don't see 2.05. Can anyone catch me up on current developments, etc.?

Thanks
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-12, 01:06   #1938
msft
 
msft's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Tokyo

2·5·61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kracker View Post
If you need testers for anything I have two 7770's.
I appreciate your offer.
msft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-12, 01:08   #1939
msft
 
msft's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Tokyo

2×5×61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by owftheevil View Post
Do you plan on make a LL test out of this?
Some day.
msft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-13, 05:39   #1940
msft
 
msft's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Tokyo

2·5·61 Posts
Default

New Version.
HD7750:
Quote:
$ sh -x ./run.sh
+ rm *.o a.out
+ g++ -c main.cpp -I /opt/AMDAPP/include/ -I /opt/clAmdFft-1.10.321/include/
+ g++ -c clFFTPlans.cpp -I /opt/AMDAPP/include/ -I /opt/clAmdFft-1.10.321/include/
+ g++ main.o clFFTPlans.o /opt/clAmdFft-1.10.321/lib64/libclAmdFft.Runtime.so -lOpenCL -lfftw3
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=:/opt/clAmdFft-1.10.321/lib64/
+ time ./a.out
Using device: Capeverde
AmdFFT size= 1048576 time= 4.200000 msec
AmdFFT size= 2097152 time= 7.900000 msec
AmdFFT size= 3145728 time= 27.000000 msec
AmdFFT size= 4194304 time= 15.900000 msec
AmdFFT size= 5242880 time= 80.200000 msec
AmdFFT size= 6291456 time= 137.800000 msec
23.93user 71.93system 45:40.64elapsed 3%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 970032maxresident)k
0inputs+18136outputs (0major+120912minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$
Attached Files
File Type: bz2 0.88.tar.bz2 (2.9 KB, 73 views)
msft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 12:51   #1941
msft
 
msft's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Tokyo

2·5·61 Posts
Default

OpenCLucas ?
HD7750:
Quote:
$ time ./a.out 216091
Using device: Capeverde
1 16384
---
215001 32768
216001 32768
M( 216091 )P, n = 32768, MacLucasFFTW v8.1 Ballester

real 12m17.124s
user 5m10.547s
sys 3m3.279s

2048k FFT 94 msec
Attached Files
File Type: bz2 0.10.tar.bz2 (32.5 KB, 84 views)
msft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 14:38   #1942
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

216810 Posts
Default

Or CLLucas

I might install linux just for tinkering with it...
kracker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 15:57   #1943
Karl M Johnson
 
Karl M Johnson's Avatar
 
Mar 2010

3·137 Posts
Default

OCLucas
Karl M Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-15, 04:43   #1944
dbaugh
 
dbaugh's Avatar
 
Aug 2005

11810 Posts
Default

I am having trouble with exponent 58715819. I have run it several times using p95v279win64 on different processors and got the following results.
M58715819 is not prime. Res64: A25E1DD191A340D0. We4: 36299458,27352921,00000000, AID: C19BB90856CE3B67E66D58C6682991CB
M58715819 is not prime. Res64: A25E1DD191A340D0. We4: 3BB22B6F,53977644,01000200, AID: C19BB90856CE3B67E66D58C6682991CB
M58715819 is not prime. Res64: A25E1DD191A340D0. We4: 349B894F,51331660,00000000, AID: C19BB90856CE3B67E66D58C6682991CB

One gave errors which is why the multiple runs but, they all gave the same Res64.

I ran CUDALucas 2.01 on a 590 (each half) and a 560Ti and got the following results.

M( 58715819 )C, 0x0ac290f866461586, n = 3670016, CUDALucas v2.01
M( 58715819 )C, 0x0ac290f866461586, n = 3670016, CUDALucas v2.01
M( 58715819 )C, 0x0ac290f866461586, n = 3670016, CUDALucas v2.01

I thought I had found the solution by moving to CUDALucas 2.03 on the 590 and got a Res64 that did not match anything previously.

M( 58715819 )C, 0x0be4ee92a264fc3b, n = 3670016, CUDALucas v2.03

What is going on? Here are the last few screen prints of the final run in case it helps. Very low err.

Iteration 58600000 M( 58715819 )C, 0xabbbf85c1135a70a, n = 3670016, CUDALucas v2.03 err = 0.0166 (12:55 real, 7.7443 ms/iter, ETA 12:54)
Iteration 58700000 M( 58715819 )C, 0x5b8436b841f162ef, n = 3670016, CUDALucas v2.03 err = 0.0166 (13:03 real, 7.8299 ms/iter, ETA 0:00)
M( 58715819 )C, 0x0be4ee92a264fc3b, n = 3670016, CUDALucas v2.03

Best regards,

David

P.S. My Res64's have always matched before and after on other similar exponents between p95 and CUDALucas.

Last fiddled with by dbaugh on 2013-06-15 at 04:51 Reason: more infor
dbaugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-09, 05:46   #1945
Karl M Johnson
 
Karl M Johnson's Avatar
 
Mar 2010

3·137 Posts
Default

Due to this thread, can someone please compile a 64 bit CUDA 5.5 binary for sm_35 arch?
Karl M Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-09, 06:32   #1946
Robert_JD
 
Robert_JD's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
So Cal

628 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl M Johnson View Post
Due to this thread, can someone please compile a 64 bit CUDA 5.5 binary for sm_35 arch?
Sure thing

Presently using Win8 x64 compiled on MSVS 12 update 3, using CuLu 2.03 source.
Attached Files
File Type: exe CUDALucas-2.04-Beta-5.5-sm_35-x64.exe (180.0 KB, 79 views)
Robert_JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-09, 07:38   #1947
Karl M Johnson
 
Karl M Johnson's Avatar
 
Mar 2010

41110 Posts
Default

2.55 ms/iter vs 2.94 ms/iter(M47).
I'm using the latest and greatest WHQL of 320.49.
It must be the toolkit, not the drivers.
Neat, thanks!

Notice the difference, btw:
Code:
26.09.2012  00:46        26,093,928 cufft64_50_35.dll
11.07.2013  14:06        74,730,784 cufft64_55.dll

Last fiddled with by Karl M Johnson on 2013-08-09 at 07:44
Karl M Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Don't DC/LL them with CudaLucas LaurV Data 131 2017-05-02 18:41
CUDALucas / cuFFT Performance on CUDA 7 / 7.5 / 8 Brain GPU Computing 13 2016-02-19 15:53
CUDALucas: which binary to use? Karl M Johnson GPU Computing 15 2015-10-13 04:44
settings for cudaLucas fairsky GPU Computing 11 2013-11-03 02:08
Trying to run CUDALucas on Windows 8 CP Rodrigo GPU Computing 12 2012-03-07 23:20

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:56.


Fri Aug 6 14:56:10 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 9:25, 1 user, load averages: 2.39, 2.78, 2.82

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.