BOINC NFS sieving - NFS@Home - Page 113

swellman · 2014-03-30, 03:40

GW_5_339 splits:

Code:

prp78 factor: 174561382997634489020809082736845509891386929515392407891589956307191949013753

prp98 factor: 44544112330958277773084231338925599725011581817314413219376765334168917598785944869083702285968761

pinhodecarlos · 2014-03-30, 14:29

Calling all post-processors helpers. 9 available jobs to crunch in the queue.

wombatman · 2014-03-30, 15:39

I'll take GW_9_248.

RichD · 2014-03-30, 17:28

I'll take GC_11_228 next but it may be a day or so before I can download it.

ETA for GW_9_249 just under 30 hours.

swellman · 2014-03-30, 17:59

I'll take GC_7_281 next.

wombatman · 2014-03-30, 20:49

ETA on GW_9_248 is ~70 hours with 8 threads and density of 115.

pinhodecarlos · 2014-03-31, 02:15

Where can I download the latest msieve 64 bit linux client? The dll's are the same from the windows version? Thank you in advance.

RichD · 2014-04-01, 01:35

GW_9_249 splits as:

Code:

prp55 factor: 3341147571762894746616313727026296885197667290370142783
prp161 factor: 54686564269637850634116594505519128973752898935720676602847847250720120659476629305425247855519101443689109180817067055830007789856782006869704861766517032270947

40 hrs to solve a 7.8M matrix using -t 4 target_density=120 on Core-i5.

pinhodecarlos · 2014-04-01, 10:47

Which one is faster, -t 4 or -t 3? Is it dependable on the processor? I might have to run my job with -t 3 or even -t 2 due to heat problems.

RichD · 2014-04-01, 15:52

I'll take GW_8_263 next.

A little under 40 hrs remain on GC_11_228. But that will be in the middle of the night for me, so call it closer to 48 hrs.

-t 4 is faster if you are using a version later than ~ SVN 920 which has the improved BL code.

pinhodecarlos · 2014-04-02, 05:05

LA ETA for GW_12_215 just under 41 hours.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Boinc Statistics for NFS@Home borked ?	thomasn	NFS@Home	1	2013-10-02 15:31
BOINC NFS sieving - RSALS	debrouxl	NFS@Home	621	2012-12-14 23:44
BOINC?	masser	Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5	1	2009-02-09 01:10
BOINC?	KEP	Twin Prime Search	212	2007-04-25 10:29
BOINC	bebarce	Software	3	2005-12-15 18:35

2014-03-30, 14:29	#1234
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 3×17×97 Posts	Calling all post-processors helpers. 9 available jobs to crunch in the queue.

2014-03-30, 15:39	#1235
wombatman I moo ablest echo power! May 2013 11011110101₂ Posts	I'll take GW_9_248.

2014-03-30, 17:28	#1236
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 2⁶·53 Posts	I'll take GC_11_228 next but it may be a day or so before I can download it. ETA for GW_9_249 just under 30 hours.

2014-03-30, 17:59	#1237
swellman Jun 2012 2²×773 Posts	I'll take GC_7_281 next.

2014-03-30, 20:49	#1238
wombatman I moo ablest echo power! May 2013 13·137 Posts	ETA on GW_9_248 is ~70 hours with 8 threads and density of 115.

2014-03-31, 02:15	#1239
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 3×17×97 Posts	Where can I download the latest msieve 64 bit linux client? The dll's are the same from the windows version? Thank you in advance.

2014-04-01, 10:47	#1241
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 3×17×97 Posts	Which one is faster, -t 4 or -t 3? Is it dependable on the processor? I might have to run my job with -t 3 or even -t 2 due to heat problems.

2014-04-01, 15:52	#1242
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 2⁶·53 Posts	I'll take GW_8_263 next. A little under 40 hrs remain on GC_11_228. But that will be in the middle of the night for me, so call it closer to 48 hrs. -t 4 is faster if you are using a version later than ~ SVN 920 which has the improved BL code.

2014-04-02, 05:05	#1243
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 3×17×97 Posts	LA ETA for GW_12_215 just under 41 hours.