mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-02-18, 10:21   #1145
BudgieJane
 
BudgieJane's Avatar
 
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK

4048 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
GC_11_225 splits as

Code:
prp57 factor: 117035737516206000301422658636143086870641529583702222247
prp146 factor: 13224271120294906777055213566759272332532501009255338788377364771003595699735034613666924913891744508392976903138521770966663385051064509021025077
Aren't they the factors of GW_11_225?
BudgieJane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 11:31   #1146
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

3×17×97 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BudgieJane View Post
Aren't they the factors of GW_11_225?
From http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/crunching.php it is correct.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 11:46   #1147
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22×773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BudgieJane View Post
Aren't they the factors of GW_11_225?
No. What makes you think so?
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 18:24   #1148
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

D4016 Posts
Default

I'll take C160_3408_1385 next.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 20:26   #1149
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22·773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
I'll take GC_11_226.
Code:
prp67 factor: 1553921527600287191718979686051836235379378213250456395166935257817
prp99 factor: 641954075373038761835304204196178626395167333003090077344083180514397760392495700368829521814229341
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 21:26   #1150
BudgieJane
 
BudgieJane's Avatar
 
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK

22·5·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
No. What makes you think so?
Something strange happened in my application this morning. When I entered
GC_11_225 it returned me 225*11^225-1. I don't understand why. It's working correctly now. I'm sorry for not checking better before writing.
BudgieJane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 22:13   #1151
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23·11·73 Posts
Default 3270_687 done

Code:
Tue Feb 18 21:44:08 2014  prp70 factor: 4514010676621572312243238194224226413610657161090911759766610581587907
Tue Feb 18 21:44:08 2014  prp108 factor: 696745277774474878010296222298269346995956048994202312288360817744618546275970282901710521370801719192054041
108 hours on i7/4930K -t6 for a 14.6M matrix

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2014-02-18 at 22:14
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 00:35   #1152
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22·773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BudgieJane View Post
Something strange happened in my application this morning. When I entered
GC_11_225 it returned me 225*11^225-1. I don't understand why. It's working correctly now. I'm sorry for not checking better before writing.
No worries - double checking is always welcome. I was afraid that I'd missed something.

Come, join the post processing fun.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 09:38   #1153
BudgieJane
 
BudgieJane's Avatar
 
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK

22×5×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Come, join the post processing fun.
I would, but I'm too busy with generalised Cunninghams at the moment.
BudgieJane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 17:54   #1154
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

Sean: I tried your yafu-generated poly for the XYYXF C176_118_93 number:
Code:
skew: 49.22
c0: 14210583768
c6: 1
Y0: -2342388736625917052139104541473924426001
Y1: 11973747886018297523742405394432
but it doesn't sieve much better than the polys generated by snfspoly: ~1 relation per q value at q0=45M (rlim /2 = alim / 2) using 31-bit LPs.

That number proves surprisingly hard for a SNFS difficulty 23x (depending on the polynomial) number. Even though 14e could probably do it with a lengthy sieving, 15e would probably be more efficient.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 20:00   #1155
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

24·7·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debrouxl View Post
Sean: I tried your yafu-generated poly for the XYYXF C176_118_93 number:
Try these:

Code:
skew: 0.417
c0: 8649
c6: 1643032
Y0: -2342388736625917052139104541473924426001
Y1: 1412902250550159107801603836542976

skew: 0.909
c0: 8649
c5: 13924
Y0: -175222860263437786894593195184969752945814431201
Y1: 2321443610525929019209484754762878943232
Not sure if either will be better...
frmky is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boinc Statistics for NFS@Home borked ? thomasn NFS@Home 1 2013-10-02 15:31
BOINC NFS sieving - RSALS debrouxl NFS@Home 621 2012-12-14 23:44
BOINC? masser Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 1 2009-02-09 01:10
BOINC? KEP Twin Prime Search 212 2007-04-25 10:29
BOINC bebarce Software 3 2005-12-15 18:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:51.


Fri Aug 6 22:51:12 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 17:20, 1 user, load averages: 3.71, 4.06, 3.90

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.