mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-02-18, 10:21   #1145
BudgieJane
 
BudgieJane's Avatar
 
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK

22·5·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
GC_11_225 splits as

Code:
prp57 factor: 117035737516206000301422658636143086870641529583702222247
prp146 factor: 13224271120294906777055213566759272332532501009255338788377364771003595699735034613666924913891744508392976903138521770966663385051064509021025077
Aren't they the factors of GW_11_225?
BudgieJane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 11:31   #1146
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

494710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BudgieJane View Post
Aren't they the factors of GW_11_225?
From http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/crunching.php it is correct.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 11:46   #1147
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22·773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BudgieJane View Post
Aren't they the factors of GW_11_225?
No. What makes you think so?
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 18:24   #1148
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

26×53 Posts
Default

I'll take C160_3408_1385 next.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 20:26   #1149
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

309210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
I'll take GC_11_226.
Code:
prp67 factor: 1553921527600287191718979686051836235379378213250456395166935257817
prp99 factor: 641954075373038761835304204196178626395167333003090077344083180514397760392495700368829521814229341
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 21:26   #1150
BudgieJane
 
BudgieJane's Avatar
 
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK

1000001002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
No. What makes you think so?
Something strange happened in my application this morning. When I entered
GC_11_225 it returned me 225*11^225-1. I don't understand why. It's working correctly now. I'm sorry for not checking better before writing.
BudgieJane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-18, 22:13   #1151
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

191816 Posts
Default 3270_687 done

Code:
Tue Feb 18 21:44:08 2014  prp70 factor: 4514010676621572312243238194224226413610657161090911759766610581587907
Tue Feb 18 21:44:08 2014  prp108 factor: 696745277774474878010296222298269346995956048994202312288360817744618546275970282901710521370801719192054041
108 hours on i7/4930K -t6 for a 14.6M matrix

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2014-02-18 at 22:14
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 00:35   #1152
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22·773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BudgieJane View Post
Something strange happened in my application this morning. When I entered
GC_11_225 it returned me 225*11^225-1. I don't understand why. It's working correctly now. I'm sorry for not checking better before writing.
No worries - double checking is always welcome. I was afraid that I'd missed something.

Come, join the post processing fun.
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 09:38   #1153
BudgieJane
 
BudgieJane's Avatar
 
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK

22·5·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Come, join the post processing fun.
I would, but I'm too busy with generalised Cunninghams at the moment.
BudgieJane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 17:54   #1154
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

Sean: I tried your yafu-generated poly for the XYYXF C176_118_93 number:
Code:
skew: 49.22
c0: 14210583768
c6: 1
Y0: -2342388736625917052139104541473924426001
Y1: 11973747886018297523742405394432
but it doesn't sieve much better than the polys generated by snfspoly: ~1 relation per q value at q0=45M (rlim /2 = alim / 2) using 31-bit LPs.

That number proves surprisingly hard for a SNFS difficulty 23x (depending on the polynomial) number. Even though 14e could probably do it with a lengthy sieving, 15e would probably be more efficient.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-19, 20:00   #1155
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

1000010100002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debrouxl View Post
Sean: I tried your yafu-generated poly for the XYYXF C176_118_93 number:
Try these:

Code:
skew: 0.417
c0: 8649
c6: 1643032
Y0: -2342388736625917052139104541473924426001
Y1: 1412902250550159107801603836542976

skew: 0.909
c0: 8649
c5: 13924
Y0: -175222860263437786894593195184969752945814431201
Y1: 2321443610525929019209484754762878943232
Not sure if either will be better...
frmky is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boinc Statistics for NFS@Home borked ? thomasn NFS@Home 1 2013-10-02 15:31
BOINC NFS sieving - RSALS debrouxl NFS@Home 621 2012-12-14 23:44
BOINC? masser Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 1 2009-02-09 01:10
BOINC? KEP Twin Prime Search 212 2007-04-25 10:29
BOINC bebarce Software 3 2005-12-15 18:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:43.


Fri Aug 6 22:43:21 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 17:12, 1 user, load averages: 4.85, 4.24, 3.78

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.