![]() |
|
|
#507 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
563598, 599850 now well beyond 100 digits, so can be unreserved here, though I'll keep going on my steam until they hit a driver again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#508 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2·33·109 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#509 |
|
Feb 2005
The Netherlands
21810 Posts |
558348 is done.
Reserving 555240 |
|
|
|
|
|
#510 |
|
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
29·41 Posts |
558270, 559140 and 559312 Done
Reserving 555240, 555252, 555300 |
|
|
|
|
|
#511 |
|
Feb 2005
The Netherlands
2×109 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#512 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23·11·73 Posts |
reserving 555360, 555760
|
|
|
|
|
|
#513 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
642410 Posts |
reserving 555828, 555912
|
|
|
|
|
|
#514 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
555360 dragged to the moon by 2^3*3^3*5^2; leaving it at C103 and taking 556020 instead
|
|
|
|
|
|
#515 |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
553014 currently at i=742, size 91, Downdriver! (I hope that no mystery worker will "spoil" it, like the last one I had)
(P.S.: I intentionally did *not* click "Quick ECM" - I think, if the sequence is small enough, the DB might "mystery work" on the sequence itself?) (Edit: I had intended to run it over the weekend and had expected it to be done by today in the morning, but it had crashed due to memory overflow, as the other active thread (gnfs-lasieve4I16e) needed almost all available memory. Seems that I need to keep the 2nd thread idle if I run 16e on a WinXP-32-box with 1 GB RAM) Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 2009-09-21 at 12:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
#516 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
That was me. Don't worry, I'm not running it, I just wanted to see where it was at on the most recent index, so I used Quick ECM.
Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-09-21 at 12:48 |
|
|
|
|
|
#517 |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
OK - with a c9x it seems to be still ok (too big for the DB to start sieving at it's own), but I don't know if the database might start to "mystery work" a sequence if you "quick ecm" it at size 7x. (~2 weeks ago, a sequence which had a downdriver, but which I had to pause for a few days because I was out of house, had been extended by either a mystery worker or by the database itself, when it starts to look for factorizations of the c6x'es and c7x'es.)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Subproject #9: 150k-200k sequences to 110 digits | Mini-Geek | Aliquot Sequences | 151 | 2011-05-14 09:01 |
| Subproject #7: 100k-150k sequences to 110 digits | 10metreh | Aliquot Sequences | 185 | 2011-01-24 18:43 |
| Subproject #6: 50k-100k sequences to 110 digits | 10metreh | Aliquot Sequences | 203 | 2010-11-14 15:00 |
| Subproject #4: 10k-50k sequences to 110 digits | 10metreh | Aliquot Sequences | 345 | 2010-07-28 07:20 |
| Subproject #3: 700k-800k sequences to 100 digits | henryzz | Aliquot Sequences | 697 | 2010-02-04 04:36 |