mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Science & Technology

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2013-06-13, 19:39   #936
Nick
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Dec 2012
The Netherlands

29·59 Posts
Default

Being the oldest person alive is a record you can break continuously (unlike most).
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-13, 19:52   #937
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
República de California

19·613 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post
Being the oldest person alive is a record you can break continuously (unlike most).
Unlike, say, "world's tallest", you mean? ;)
ewmayer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 02:18   #938
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,497 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post
Being the oldest person alive is a record you can break continuously (unlike most).
...unless your name is Benjamin Button? ;-)
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 02:56   #939
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

2·1,877 Posts
Default

Are Languages Shaped By Geography?
Quote:
A study of more than 550 languages around the world found that tongues spoken in high-altitude regions contain more sounds called ejective consonants, made with a burst of air, than languages closer to sea level.
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 03:48   #940
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×3×1,693 Posts
Default Hands-free technology causing driver ‘inattention blindness’

http://hexus.net/ce/news/automotive/...ion-blindness/
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 04:19   #941
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22·23·107 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kladner View Post
Studies have shown for several years now that it is the brain and not the hands or eyes that are the problem with hands free mobile phones. One of the tests that showed there is a difference, those that use radios while driving (two way radios, but only half-duplex). There was better performance during half-duplex. The areas of the brain that light up when talking on the phone are those that are also used during driving (spatial and visualization areas.) Add that on top of the fact that the other party has no clue what is going on where the driver is. It is like carrying teenagers in the vehicle, they don't know when to be quiet and let the driver focus.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 04:36   #942
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2·3·1,693 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Studies have shown for several years now that it is the brain and not the hands or eyes that are the problem with hands free mobile phones. One of the tests that showed there is a difference, those that use radios while driving (two way radios, but only half-duplex). There was better performance during half-duplex. The areas of the brain that light up when talking on the phone are those that are also used during driving (spatial and visualization areas.) Add that on top of the fact that the other party has no clue what is going on where the driver is. It is like carrying teenagers in the vehicle, they don't know when to be quiet and let the driver focus.
And unlike having a conversation with a person riding shotgun, you do not have an extra set of eyes on the road. A paranoid passenger is one of the best collision avoidance systems ever, if one can avoid getting irritated. I'd rather get an unneeded warning than have a wreck. Hence, I am very tolerant of my partner's anxieties and passenger side brake stomping.
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-14, 06:10   #943
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22·23·107 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kladner View Post
And unlike having a conversation with a person riding shotgun, you do not have an extra set of eyes on the road. A paranoid passenger is one of the best collision avoidance systems ever,
As part of one of the studies that I heard about, it turns out that a competent driver is a better driver when there is another competent driver with them.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-15, 13:06   #944
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

838410 Posts
Default

This video is a trip -- through the known universe

I got the link to this from Yahoo. admittedly I didn't watch the whole video. the French accent doesn't help me.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-15, 20:00   #945
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
República de California

19×613 Posts
Default

U.S. top court bars patents on human genes unless synthetic

Not even the usual flip-a-coin 5-4 crap on this one.
ewmayer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-06-16, 03:33   #946
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

2×1,877 Posts
Default

Thought I'd mention SelectedPapers.net. This is a way to find, read, share and comment on academic papers. At present, it works with Google+ users. Several mathematicians are giving it a try. http://docs.selectedpapers.net/intro.html
Quote:
  • Now you can initiate and join discussions of papers directly on any SelectedPapers.net page.
  • Alternatively, without even signing in to SelectedPapers.net, you can just write posts on Google+ containing the hashtag #spnetwork, and they will automatically be included within the SelectedPapers.net discussions (i.e. indexed and displayed so that other people can reply to them etc.). Here’s an example of a Google+ post example:
    Quote:
    This article by Perelman outlines a proof of the Poincare conjecture!

    #spnetwork #mustread #geometry #poincareConjecture arXiv:math/0211159
    You need the tag #spnetwork for SelectedPapers.net to notice your post. Tags like #mustread, #recommend, and so on indicate your attitude to a paper. Tags like #geometry, #poincareConjecture and so on indicate a subject area: they let people search for papers by subject. A tag of the form arXiv:math/0211159 is necessary for arXiv papers; note that this does not include a # symbol.

    For PubMed papers, include a tag of the form PMID:22291635. Other published papers usually have a DOI (digital object identifier), so for those include a tag of the form doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00001.

    Tags are the backbone of SelectedPapers.net; you can read more about them here.
  • You can also post and see comments at https://selectedpapers.net. This page also lets you search for papers in the arXiv and search for published papers via their DOI or Pubmed ID. If you are signed in, the homepage will also show the latest recommendations (from people you’re subscribed to), papers on your reading list, and papers you tagged as interesting for your work.
Papers
  • Papers are the center of just about everything here. Here’s what you can do with a paper:
  • click to see the full text of the paper via arXiv.org or the publisher’s website.
  • read other people’s recommendations and discussion of the paper.
  • add it to your Reading List. This is simply a private list of papers – a convenient way of marking a paper for further attention later. When you are logged in, your Reading list is shown on the homepage. No one else can see your reading list.
  • share the paper with others (such as your Google+ Circles or Google+ communities that you are part of).
  • tag it as interesting for a specific topic. You do this either by clicking the checkbox of a topic (it shows topics that other readers have tagged the paper), by selecting from a list of topics that you have previously tagged as interesting to you, or by simply typing a tag name. These tags are public; that is, everyone can see what topics the paper has been tagged with, and who tagged them.
  • post a question or comment about the paper, or reply to what other people have said about it. This traffic is public. Specifically, clicking the Discuss this Paper button gives you a Google+ window (with appropriate tags already filled in) for writing a post. Note that in order for the spnet to see your post, you must include Public in the list of recipients for your post (this is an inherent limitation of Google+, which limits apps to see only the same posts that any internet user would see – even when you are signed-in to the app as yourself on Google+).
  • recommend it to others. Once again, you must include Public in the list of recipients for your post, or the spnet cannot see it.
We strongly suggest that you include a topic hashtag for your research interest area. E.g. if there is a hashtag that people in your field commonly use for posting on Twitter, use it. If you have to make up a new hashtag, keep it intuitive and follow “camelCase” capitalization e.g. #openPeerReview.

Last fiddled with by only_human on 2013-06-16 at 03:44 Reason: linkify "here." Deleted live-live date (not sure if accurate)
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official "Faits erronés dans de belles-lettres" thread ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08
Official "all-Greek-to-me Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whinge-thread cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:13.


Fri Aug 6 22:13:29 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:42, 1 user, load averages: 3.63, 3.23, 2.98

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.