mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-11-10, 16:39   #67
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3×52×71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
Have you tried using it with throttle? Even half the output is better than none.
It has now "survived" for 12 hours at 50% Throttle.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-10, 19:07   #68
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

2×7×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
I can get a compact case PIV 3.2 or 3.4 Ghz used PC from work for $200.
PIVs are very bad at TFing to low levels. That´s because the SSE2 optimizations won´t kick in below 64 bits. If you use a PIV for TF make sure you start at 64 bits. PIIIs and AMDs (Athlon, Duron) are good at low levels.
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-10, 21:09   #69
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

14CD16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycorn View Post
PIVs are very bad at TFing to low levels. That´s because the SSE2 optimizations won´t kick in below 64 bits. If you use a PIV for TF make sure you start at 64 bits. PIIIs and AMDs (Athlon, Duron) are good at low levels.
That verifies a recent observation.
My PIII 866 can do 83M exponent 63-64 bits in 1 hour.
My PIV 2.4 takes 25 minutes - just over double yet for a DC or higher bits of factoring it is closer to 6-8 times as fast.

If I upgrade I don't plan to use it for LMH.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-11, 10:46   #70
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

110001011102 Posts
Default

Right.
I suggest P-1 work. I have a PIV 3200 (Northwood core) with 2 GB of memory that used to work on LL, and later on DC tests, but recently I have assigned it to P-1 factoring and is doing pretty well. Allocating 1200 MB (daytime) and 1700 MB (night time) of memory, it returns a result every 2.5 days, with a probability of success about 5,9 to 6%.
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-11, 15:13   #71
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3·52·71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycorn View Post
Right.
I suggest P-1 work. I have a PIV 3200 (Northwood core) with 2 GB of memory that used to work on LL, and later on DC tests, but recently I have assigned it to P-1 factoring and is doing pretty well. Allocating 1200 MB (daytime) and 1700 MB (night time) of memory, it returns a result every 2.5 days, with a probability of success about 5,9 to 6%.
The PIV 2.4 Ghz only has 512M RAM. I ran a few P-1 allocating 400M and it took it 4 days for a 51M P-1. However, with so much RAM on P-1 if I ever needed to do anything else on it , it was REAL sluggish to get going.

4 days for a 4 point P-1 = 1 PPD
14 days for a 18 point DC = 1.3 PPD
26 minutes for a .0235 63-64 TF = 1.3 PPD
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-11, 15:14   #72
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

AD016 Posts
Default

Do DC or factoring in the 65+ range. I'd say DC as it is underpowered and TF overpowered.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-11, 16:49   #73
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

62E16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
The PIV 2.4 Ghz only has 512M RAM.
Got your point. Go for DC, then.
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-11, 17:40   #74
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3·52·71 Posts
Default

DC is where I actually have settled with that PC

... Just not Washington :-)

Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2009-11-11 at 17:40
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-24, 01:02   #75
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3×52×71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markr View Post
On to 83M.
Forgive me, I just took the last 50 in the 83M range.
I'll be done in 2 and a half days.
Nothing left unassigned below 100M now.

On another note, if all goes well and I get my new quad build this week I may be cease and desist these special low bit ranges though I still have a Duron that is best suited for this work but it is not very accessible so unless things change...

Thanks, it's been fun.
Watch for me though in other work types.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-24, 03:25   #76
markr
 
markr's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney

3·191 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
Forgive me, I just took the last 50 in the 83M range.
I'll be done in 2 and a half days.
Nothing left unassigned below 100M now.

...

Thanks, it's been fun.
Watch for me though in other work types.
Thank you too - it has been a fun journey.

So 83M is just about done to 2^64 bits - another milestone! This range was done more quickly than 80M: less than two months compared to three or four. There was more firepower, from various people, which is good!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
We're all working towards the same goal, aren't we.
markr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-11-24, 04:25   #77
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

14CD16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markr View Post
Thank you too - it has been a fun journey.

So 83M is just about done to 2^64 bits - another milestone! This range was done more quickly than 80M: less than two months compared to three or four. There was more firepower, from various people, which is good!
At the rate some BIG guns are factoring (i.e GIMPS Visualization, et al) there may not be any work left below 64 bits in a few months

Are you planning to continue above 100M now or start a new "project"?
"you" in this context can be any that have been collectively working in this <100M range.

Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2009-11-24 at 04:28 Reason: Last 2 lines
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
76.5-77M to 63 bits lycorn Lone Mersenne Hunters 2 2007-05-25 21:32
64 bits versus 32 bits Windows S485122 Software 2 2006-10-31 19:14
52.0M - 52.1M to 63 bits Rde Lone Mersenne Hunters 4 2006-10-14 18:21
42.6 - 43.0M to 61 bits MrHappy Lone Mersenne Hunters 6 2006-05-26 01:10
35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits Khemikal796 Lone Mersenne Hunters 12 2005-12-01 21:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:23.


Fri Jul 7 13:23:39 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 10:52, 0 users, load averages: 1.42, 1.21, 1.16

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔