![]() |
|
|
#67 |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3×52×71 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
2×7×113 Posts |
PIVs are very bad at TFing to low levels. That´s because the SSE2 optimizations won´t kick in below 64 bits. If you use a PIV for TF make sure you start at 64 bits. PIIIs and AMDs (Athlon, Duron) are good at low levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
14CD16 Posts |
Quote:
My PIII 866 can do 83M exponent 63-64 bits in 1 hour. My PIV 2.4 takes 25 minutes - just over double yet for a DC or higher bits of factoring it is closer to 6-8 times as fast. If I upgrade I don't plan to use it for LMH. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
110001011102 Posts |
Right.
I suggest P-1 work. I have a PIV 3200 (Northwood core) with 2 GB of memory that used to work on LL, and later on DC tests, but recently I have assigned it to P-1 factoring and is doing pretty well. Allocating 1200 MB (daytime) and 1700 MB (night time) of memory, it returns a result every 2.5 days, with a probability of success about 5,9 to 6%. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3·52·71 Posts |
Quote:
4 days for a 4 point P-1 = 1 PPD 14 days for a 18 point DC = 1.3 PPD 26 minutes for a .0235 63-64 TF = 1.3 PPD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
AD016 Posts |
Do DC or factoring in the 65+ range. I'd say DC as it is underpowered and TF overpowered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
62E16 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3·52·71 Posts |
DC is where I actually have settled with that PC
... Just not Washington :-) Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2009-11-11 at 17:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3×52×71 Posts |
Forgive me, I just took the last 50 in the 83M range.
I'll be done in 2 and a half days. Nothing left unassigned below 100M now. On another note, if all goes well and I get my new quad build this week I may be cease and desist these special low bit ranges though I still have a Duron that is best suited for this work but it is not very accessible so unless things change...Thanks, it's been fun. Watch for me though in other work types. |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 | |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
Quote:
So 83M is just about done to 2^64 bits - another milestone! This range was done more quickly than 80M: less than two months compared to three or four. There was more firepower, from various people, which is good! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
14CD16 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Are you planning to continue above 100M now or start a new "project"? "you" in this context can be any that have been collectively working in this <100M range. Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2009-11-24 at 04:28 Reason: Last 2 lines |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 76.5-77M to 63 bits | lycorn | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2007-05-25 21:32 |
| 64 bits versus 32 bits Windows | S485122 | Software | 2 | 2006-10-31 19:14 |
| 52.0M - 52.1M to 63 bits | Rde | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 4 | 2006-10-14 18:21 |
| 42.6 - 43.0M to 61 bits | MrHappy | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 6 | 2006-05-26 01:10 |
| 35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits | Khemikal796 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 12 | 2005-12-01 21:35 |