mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > New To GIMPS? Start Here! > Information & Answers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-06-15, 01:33   #12
Primeinator
 
Primeinator's Avatar
 
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..

3×5×61 Posts
Default

I've only heard giga used as a prefix for units. 10^9 I've always heard referred to as one billion.
Primeinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-15, 13:48   #13
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

10000101010112 Posts
Default

Yes, I meant giga. Maybe it wasn't really right for that situation, but I'm just used to using K, M, G, etc. as kilo, mega, giga, etc. even in situations involving numbers. For example, in sieving you almost always refer to G and T, and not billion and trillion or 10^9 and 10^12. Why is it like this? I don't really know. Also, "megabit prime" is a fairly common term referring to primes that in binary form have over 10^6 digits, so I suppose you could extend that to "gigabit candidate" for Mersenne's over 2^10^9 a.k.a. 2^1G a.k.a. 2^1B.

And no, PrimeNet v5 has absolutely no support, as far as I can tell, for p>1G. You can't request the status of those exponents. Prime95 can't even run LL tests that large. It can factor numbers that big, but when you manually add them to the worktodo and communicate with the Overmind (PrimeNet), it says:
Code:
pnErrorResult=40
pnErrorDetail=ra: trial factoring not required, exponent: 1000000901, ef: 80
==END==
Prime95 can still factor it, but PrimeNet doesn't recognize it
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-17, 18:48   #14
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
Yes, I meant giga. Maybe it wasn't really right for that situation, but I'm just used to using K, M, G, etc. as kilo, mega, giga, etc. even in situations involving numbers. For example, in sieving you almost always refer to G and T, and not billion and trillion or 10^9 and 10^12. Why is it like this? I don't really know.
Will quadrillions be represented as P when we come to them? It seems rather unnatural.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-17, 19:09   #15
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

426710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
Will quadrillions be represented as P when we come to them? It seems rather unnatural.
Yes. It's already used in some very large sieving applications. e.g. at http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=1230#13578
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-18, 04:59   #16
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

1E0C16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
Will quadrillions be represented as P when we come to them? It seems rather unnatural.
Metric system. After P comes E, Z and Y.

For the current official prefixes, see http://www.bipm.org/en/si/prefixes.html

For someone's idea for future extensions beyond P, E, Z and Y (... X, W, V, U, TD, S, R, Q, PP, O, N, MI, L), see http://jimvb.home.mindspring.com/unitsystem.htm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
Yes. It's already used in some very large sieving applications. e.g. at http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=1230#13578
However, a footnote to the next message, #16318, shows that not everyone fully accepts the decimal basis for those prefixes.
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-06-18, 05:31   #17
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2·7·19·37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehead View Post
Metric system. After P comes E, Z and Y.
Thus the expression Eazy PEZY.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing Trilo Miscellaneous Math 25 2018-03-11 23:20
New PC test re-test plan? dh1 Information & Answers 8 2015-12-11 11:50
Double check LL test faster than first run test lidocorc Software 3 2008-12-03 15:12
Will the torture test, test ALL available memory? swinster Software 2 2007-12-01 17:54
A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ? T.Rex Math 0 2004-10-26 21:37

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:29.


Fri Aug 6 10:29:37 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 4:58, 1 user, load averages: 4.33, 3.83, 3.79

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.