![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3×5×61 Posts |
I've only heard giga used as a prefix for units. 10^9 I've always heard referred to as one billion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10000101010112 Posts |
Yes, I meant giga. Maybe it wasn't really right for that situation, but I'm just used to using K, M, G, etc. as kilo, mega, giga, etc. even in situations involving numbers. For example, in sieving you almost always refer to G and T, and not billion and trillion or 10^9 and 10^12. Why is it like this? I don't really know.
Also, "megabit prime" is a fairly common term referring to primes that in binary form have over 10^6 digits, so I suppose you could extend that to "gigabit candidate" for Mersenne's over 2^10^9 a.k.a. 2^1G a.k.a. 2^1B.And no, PrimeNet v5 has absolutely no support, as far as I can tell, for p>1G. You can't request the status of those exponents. Prime95 can't even run LL tests that large. It can factor numbers that big, but when you manually add them to the worktodo and communicate with the Overmind (PrimeNet), it says: Code:
pnErrorResult=40 pnErrorDetail=ra: trial factoring not required, exponent: 1000000901, ef: 80 ==END== |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
426710 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
1E0C16 Posts |
Quote:
For the current official prefixes, see http://www.bipm.org/en/si/prefixes.html For someone's idea for future extensions beyond P, E, Z and Y (... X, W, V, U, TD, S, R, Q, PP, O, N, MI, L), see http://jimvb.home.mindspring.com/unitsystem.htm Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·7·19·37 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing | Trilo | Miscellaneous Math | 25 | 2018-03-11 23:20 |
| New PC test re-test plan? | dh1 | Information & Answers | 8 | 2015-12-11 11:50 |
| Double check LL test faster than first run test | lidocorc | Software | 3 | 2008-12-03 15:12 |
| Will the torture test, test ALL available memory? | swinster | Software | 2 | 2007-12-01 17:54 |
| A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ? | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2004-10-26 21:37 |