![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
91510 Posts |
What is the largest Lucas-Lehmer test completed/underway at the present moment?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
23·7·13 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3×5×61 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
23×7×13 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
91510 Posts |
In the 540,000,000 exponent range?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
23·7·13 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Nov 2008
1001000100102 Posts |
There is one exponent assigned for an LL in the 997M range...
(Before you ask, it is not me who took it.) Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-06-14 at 19:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
According to PrimeNet v5...
Largest "Composite - LL-D" (i.e. two matching LLs saying composite were run) is in 100000000 (2^100M) range. (this one is M100000007) Largest "Status Unproven - LL" (i.e. one LL was run) is in the 79000000 (2^79M) range. Largest "Assigned - LL" (i.e. underway LL test) is in the 997000000 (2^997M, ~10^300M) range, as already noted. PrimeNet doesn't have info above 2^1G. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
23·7·13 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3×5×61 Posts |
You can request them, I believe. Wow...997M. Bet that takes awhile.
Edit: why do you call it 1G? Last fiddled with by Primeinator on 2009-06-15 at 00:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
2D816 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing | Trilo | Miscellaneous Math | 25 | 2018-03-11 23:20 |
| New PC test re-test plan? | dh1 | Information & Answers | 8 | 2015-12-11 11:50 |
| Double check LL test faster than first run test | lidocorc | Software | 3 | 2008-12-03 15:12 |
| Will the torture test, test ALL available memory? | swinster | Software | 2 | 2007-12-01 17:54 |
| A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ? | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2004-10-26 21:37 |