![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
23·7·13 Posts |
Hi
My Prime95 reports me that some exponents may be reassigned. The author wrote me for big exponents this won't be happening. My question is what is big because exponents between 20M and 100M are most certainly needing more than a year of calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23·11·73 Posts |
21M is 0.031s/iter on a slow i7, 0.028s/iter on a slow core2, and 0.063s/iter on a slow Athlon64, so between seven and sixteen days ... way under a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
10110110002 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
23·7·13 Posts |
How about numbers like M122xxxxxx? They need around a year with 2 Core2Duo Cores ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Aug 2002
Ann Arbor, MI
433 Posts |
Don't worry about it. Nothing is automatic. It's just saying that George reserves the right to reassign exponents if somebody holds a reservation for a long time without making reasonable progress. It's mainly there to prevent people from hoarding years of work, or putting first-time tests on older hardware.
|
|
|
|