![]() |
|
|
#133 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Yes, a tremendous help by Lennart! He had previously helped to do a large part of a couple of previous sieving drives so hats off to him!
Let's not forget Bruce who has also previously been a huge help on sieving and putting a large amount of resources for extended periods on the less popular non-top-5000 ranges. If anyone is still interested in helping sieve, our next big effort is k=300-400 for n=1M-2M. Ian started that one a couple of months ago (I think) over on the other forum. The last I checked, it was complete to P=4T with Lennart and possibly Ian having completed some 1T ranges for P>5T. Optimal sieve depth for that one is likely P>100T, even for breaking off the lower n-range; perhaps n=1M-1.2M. I would call it "low medium" priority at this point but I would guess that k=300-400 will be complete to n=1M within 3 months so we don't want to let it sit idle for too long. With only 50 k's, the sieve rate should be quite a bit faster than our normal huge sieving drives. I'm looking forward to having NPLB have ranges around n=100K, n=450K-470K, 500K-520K, 665K-675K, 720K-740K, and 1M all available in various drives at the same time. I think that at our current processing rate (and anticipated demand for the new drive), that is close to what we would have by the time k=300-400 is complete to n=1M and that sieving drive is optimal for the lower n-range. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-06-18 at 22:06 |
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Aug 2008
Good old Germany
3·47 Posts |
Would ther also be individual k´s or something similary things on this drives?
I´ve learned to love this individual k´s. ;) |
|
|
|
|
#135 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
289B16 Posts |
Quote:
In a synopsis, we probably won't do anything much different for this range for n>1M than what we've been doing for n<=1M. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Aug 2008
Good old Germany
14110 Posts |
Thanks Gary. So I will look in a good mood in the future. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
Up to 29T will be done this evening.
29700G-30T will be done tomorrow 1400 UTC /Lennart |
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25×5×7 Posts |
28500G-29T emailed to gary
/lennart |
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
21408 Posts |
29700G-30T emailed to gary
![]() ![]() /lennart |
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
26000G-26400G complete
Results emailed |
|
|
|
|
#141 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242338 Posts |
29000G-29700G completed yesterday. I have all factors from everyone now.
Later tonight or early morning depending on your time zone, I'll get a new drive started. Excellent work everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
What is the schedule/plan for starting non-top-5000 work in this range?
Will we be using PRPNet? Last fiddled with by Flatlander on 2009-06-23 at 10:28 Reason: Typo. (Chicho and Groucho weren't involved.) |
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Gary and I are currently discussing that. So far, we know that we'll be using k=3200-3400, n=50K-425K with PRPnet as a stress test. That will probably be the first thing we do with non-top-5000 work in the k=2000-3400 range; once we've verified that PRPnet works stably with lots of very small numbers, we may consider doing the much larger k=2000-3000, n=50K-425K range through it as well.
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #10 k=1400-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 61 | 2013-01-30 16:08 |
| Team drive #12 k=2000-3000 n=50K-425K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 96 | 2012-02-19 03:53 |
| k=2000-3400 k's to be pulled from upcoming drives | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 11 | 2009-06-12 21:28 |
| Sieving drive for k=1003-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 160 | 2009-05-10 00:50 |
| Sieving drive for k=1005-2000 n=200K-500K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 118 | 2009-01-17 16:05 |