mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Puzzles

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-05-15, 04:40   #1
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101Γ—103 Posts

2·7·19·37 Posts
Default 5=4, ..., 35=2, 14=?

I don't know the answer to this one, it was brought to me by some one else. They got it from the radio.

5=4
7=17
9=25
35=2

14=?
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-15, 05:38   #2
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

11110000011002 Posts
Default

Since 7 * 2 = 14, substitution on the left gives 17 * 35 = 14.

14 = 595.

Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2009-05-15 at 05:40 Reason: Actually, I think we had this one not too long ago.
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-15, 07:18   #3
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101Γ—103 Posts

2×7×19×37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehead View Post
Since 7 * 2 = 14, substitution on the left gives 17 * 35 = 14.
I think that you misunderstood.

It might be better stated:
5 -> 4
7 -> 17
9 -> 25
35 -> 2

or 5 through some unknown process, function, or method yields 4, etc.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-15, 16:10   #4
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22·3·641 Posts
Default

Oh, I understood the "unknown process, function, or method" part, but thought the "=" implied equivalence and commutivity.

Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2009-05-15 at 16:12
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-15, 16:20   #5
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

2×11×283 Posts
Default

The last 5 game scores for some insignificant local sports team?
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-15, 17:19   #6
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22·3·641 Posts
Default

Maybe like cricket scores on BBC? "17 for 4, 99 for 88, 2 for 102" -- it's assumed that the intended audience knows what the numbers mean (just as in an American broadcast of baseball scores), but I don't!

Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2009-05-15 at 17:22 Reason: I'd welcome a cricket-score explanation from any British-Empire folks.
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-15, 17:27   #7
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

1078510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehead View Post
Maybe like cricket scores on BBC? "17 for 4, 99 for 88, 2 for 102" -- it's assumed that the intended audience knows what the numbers mean (just as in an American broadcast of baseball scores), but I don't!
The fist number is the number of runs gained so far in the game. The second is the number of wickets that have fallen (i.e. the number of batsmen dismissed for some reason, such as being caught). The second number is < 11, so 99 for 88 and 2 for 102 are not cricket scores. 17 for 4 means that four batsmen have already been given out and a total of 17 runs have been scored at this point. Not a very good score, to be honest.

Further information on the rules of cricket may be found here http://www.colinseymour.co.uk/the-rules-of-cricket

Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-15, 18:51   #8
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts
Default

The final score for a completed, undeclared innings (i.e. all out) is "xxx for 10", although this is normally referred to as "xxx all out" or just "xxx". There are 11 batsmen but only 10 wickets fall because the batsmen bat in pairs. One little caveat to the scoring system - batsmen retiring hurt do not count as wickets.

BTW the second day of the second Test between England and the West Indies was rained off.

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-05-15 at 18:52
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-16, 01:00   #9
99.94
 
99.94's Avatar
 
Dec 2004
The Land of Lost Content

27310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
The fist number is the number of runs gained so far in the game. The second is the number of wickets that have fallen (i.e. the number of batsmen dismissed for some reason, such as being caught). The second number is < 11, so 99 for 88 and 2 for 102 are not cricket scores. 17 for 4 means that four batsmen have already been given out and a total of 17 runs have been scored at this point. Not a very good score, to be honest.

Further information on the rules of cricket may be found here http://www.colinseymour.co.uk/the-rules-of-cricket

Paul
Ahem! It depends where you live. 2 for 102 is exactly how it would be put in Australasia (at least).
99.94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-16, 09:08   #10
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

2A2116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 99.94 View Post
Ahem! It depends where you live. 2 for 102 is exactly how it would be put in Australasia (at least).
Thanks. I wasn't aware of that.


Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-16, 09:29   #11
davieddy
 
davieddy's Avatar
 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England

2×3×13×83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Thanks. I wasn't aware of that.


Paul
I'm surprised to hear of this gap in your omniscience.
I wonder what Hardy would make of it

Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2009-05-16 at 09:49
davieddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 05:34.


Fri Aug 6 05:34:12 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 3 mins, 1 user, load averages: 2.65, 2.86, 2.68

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.