mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-12-23, 20:20   #529
biwema
 
biwema's Avatar
 
Mar 2004

3×127 Posts
Default

Status 909624: passed 4000 steps now.

Step 4020, size 131, c108, 2^3 * 3 * 5 quickly growing.

Noticeable:
909624:3962
c110: running 1419 ecm curves at B1=3e6...
Using B1=3000000, B2=5706890290, polynomial Dickson(6), sigma=1802488818
Step 1 took 23547ms
Step 2 took 12781ms
********** Factor found in step 2: 4779028487530611874654541981440933386071317166117
[Dec 11 2009, 01:30:08] *** Neat 49-digit factor found: 4779028487530611874654541981440933386071317166117
[Dec 11 2009, 01:30:08] *** prp49 = 4779028487530611874654541981440933386071317166117

[Dec 11 2009, 01:30:08] Cofactor 13127970901614015524168684962328109083848080230515776473746427 (62 digits)

----

Status 859974: Step 6225, Size 134, running C129, 2 * 3
biwema is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-27, 04:47   #530
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

2·19·101 Posts
Default

Since there's nothing shown in the first post of the reservation thread for details, here is some info for 736950:

Currently at index 1104 and back up to size 101 with a 22.

After a downswing as low as 79 digits, it picked up a 3 (even 32 for a bit) and made its way back up. The 3 has since left.

Take Care,
Ed
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-27, 09:29   #531
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

1001000100102 Posts
Default

Discussion about post 200000 has been moved to the Lounge.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-28, 07:38   #532
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

2,593 Posts
Default

392430: i5572, size 123, 2^3*5 guide
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-31, 07:13   #533
schickel
 
schickel's Avatar
 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville

1000010010102 Posts
Default

Here's what my sequences look like at the end of the year:
Code:
12/30/09
  Seq   Index  Size  Co-factor   Driver/Guide
170196   1753   135    100       2^3
171018   1881   125    117       2^3 * 5
363270   1654   141    132       2^5 * 3
604560   2509   131    104       2^2 * 3^2 * 5 * 223^2 (!)
NFS ~75% on the c132; ECM running on the rest.
schickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-01, 08:12   #534
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

50418 Posts
Default

735966 : i3579, size 105, 2^2*7 driver
After downdriver run from 120 digits to 63 digits it going upwards with 2^2*3 and 2^4*3 guides and obtained 2^2*7 driver at 100 digit.
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-02, 12:19   #535
biwema
 
biwema's Avatar
 
Mar 2004

3·127 Posts
Default

Status: 859974 Index 6244
Size 135, C132 (2*3^2)
Now it gets quite hard. I expect about 1 week (compared to second largest calculation: 121 hours for a C129)

The poly seems also not that good: 5.86e-11 (compared to 4.51e-11 as good score; my feeling always say it is optimal if the score is 50% higher than "good score")
How big is the influence of a very good poly?
biwema is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-03, 14:40   #536
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2×33×43 Posts
Default

675600 has dropped a 3 and become stable at 101 digits.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-28, 16:16   #537
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

2,593 Posts
Default

740856: i5945, size 125, 2^4*31
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-29, 15:00   #538
Greebley
 
Greebley's Avatar
 
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA

3·281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biwema View Post
Status: 859974 Index 6244
Size 135, C132 (2*3^2)
Now it gets quite hard. I expect about 1 week (compared to second largest calculation: 121 hours for a C129)

The poly seems also not that good: 5.86e-11 (compared to 4.51e-11 as good score; my feeling always say it is optimal if the score is 50% higher than "good score")
How big is the influence of a very good poly?
I haven't tried quite that large, but gotten close. My gut feeling is that it isn't worth worrying too much about the poly until you get bigger than that where it starts to really matter. Not sure where that cutoff is but I think higher than 132.
Greebley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-29, 20:48   #539
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

sequence 10212 is currently at index 2267, size 138, 2*3*7, currently GNFSing the c133 cofactor.
(note: according to this benchmark, lpbr/a 27 is faster than lpbr/a 28 (both: mfbr/a = 2*lpbr/a) for a c133!)

Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 2010-01-29 at 20:48
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any updates please ? Aillas XYYXF Project 11 2020-04-05 12:38
Updates Baumann Eduard Information & Answers 5 2012-10-25 18:44
result updates?? timespy Information & Answers 3 2009-04-28 20:26
K=13236795 Status Post ValerieVonck 15k Search 33 2005-10-31 22:54
Stats updates SandStar NFSNET Discussion 7 2004-07-03 22:59

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:03.


Fri Aug 6 10:03:05 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 4:32, 1 user, load averages: 3.96, 4.28, 4.17

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.