mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-08-13, 19:26   #364
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

242558 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
I think we should keep that thread because we don't want to accidentally put a reservation in the retired sequences thread. Since we split the top post of the retired thread, I've nearly put a sequence in the wrong section twice, but it's easy to notice
??

The retired sequence thread is what I suggested deleting and what David was referring to. If you delete "retired sequences" and rename "reservations" to "reservations and releases" or something like that, then you won't accidentally put a reservation in the "retired sequences" thread. lmao

Isn't this circular logic? Delete the "retired sequences" thread and the confusion goes away. Are you referring to deleting the "reservations" thread? If so, no, that would not be a good thing.

I have a suggestion if you want to keep the thread and give people recognition for the work that they did: Rename the thread: "Recently completed work" or something like that. Those sequences aren't being retired. They are simply dormant at the moment and available for searching.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-08-13 at 19:34
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-13, 19:30   #365
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2·33·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
??

If you remove the retired sequence thread, then you won't accidentally put a reservation in that thread. lmao

Isn't this circular logic? Eliminate the thread and the confusion goes away.

I have a suggestion if you want to keep the thread and give people recognition for the work that they did: Rename the thread: "Recently completed work" or something like that. Those sequences aren't being retired. They are simply dormant at the moment and available for searching.


Clearly I wasn't thinking about what I was writing. I meant to write "I think we should keep that thread because we don't want to accidentally put a reservation in the "retired sequences" post!

The idea being that the sequences not currently being worked do not belong in the same post as the ones that are, so a separate post would be needed.

Meanwhile, we have a new title for the retired sequences thread. Any other ideas?

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-08-13 at 19:37
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-13, 21:52   #366
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,497 Posts
Default

A thread for the sequences that "...passed on! This sequence is no more! It has ceased to be! It's expired and gone to meet its maker! This is a late sequence! It's a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! Its metabolical processes are of interest only to historians! It's hopped the twig! It's shuffled off this mortal coil! It's run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible! This.... is an EX-sequence!"
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-14, 12:59   #367
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

426710 Posts
Default

I think it should be much clearer where reservations, statuses, and retirements should be posted. Whether this is 3 separate threads or 1, or 2, I don't really care.

507360: (link broken at the moment due to DB being down) 7 lines after I started it, it picked up 2^6 and soon lots of other small factors, which grew it 5 full digits before dropping to 2^4 where it is now. Line 644 is 2^4*3*c109. If this passes to GNFS, it will be the largest GNFS I've run (next largest was c105; not counting assisting on team sieves). I'm on run 478 out of 904, B1=1e6. (which will be followed by just 35 curves at B1=3e6 to put it at t35.015)

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-08-14 at 13:12 Reason: changed run from 459 to 478, added # of 3e6 curves
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-17, 05:17   #368
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

32·13·89 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
A thread for the sequences that "...passed on! This sequence is no more! It has ceased to be! It's expired and gone to meet its maker! This is a late sequence! It's a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! Its metabolical processes are of interest only to historians! It's hopped the twig! It's shuffled off this mortal coil! It's run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible! This.... is an EX-sequence!"
ROFLMAO!!




I about cried I laughed so hard Batalov!!

Good one!

That's exactly what I used to think "retired" sequences meant. Anyway, now, it says "released" sequences. Much better. lol
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-17, 06:02   #369
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

242558 Posts
Default

I am now done with 19248. Status:

19248; i=2167; sz 120; C106; +52; 2^5*3
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-17, 18:21   #370
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

32×13×89 Posts
Default

I am now done with 40404. Status:

40404; i=2833; sz 110; C106; +139; 2^4*31
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-19, 03:44   #371
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

32×13×89 Posts
Default

I am now done with 104692 and 155154. Statuses:

104692; i=1027; sz 111; C103; +38; 2^4*31
155154; i=875; sz 113; C100; +13; 2^5*3*7
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-19, 22:05   #372
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

32·13·89 Posts
Default

I am now done with 104904. Status:

104904; i=1748; sz 105; C102; +57; 2^4*31
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-20, 18:10   #373
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

32·13·89 Posts
Default

I am now done with 102450. Status:

102450; i=742; sz 109; C101; +26; 2^3*3
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-08-21, 06:34   #374
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

32×13×89 Posts
Default

I am now done with 104304 and 109710. Statuses:

104304; i=629; sz 121; C111; +74; 2^6*3*127
109710; i=1547; sz 107; C102; +57; 2^2*7
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any updates please ? Aillas XYYXF Project 11 2020-04-05 12:38
Updates Baumann Eduard Information & Answers 5 2012-10-25 18:44
result updates?? timespy Information & Answers 3 2009-04-28 20:26
K=13236795 Status Post ValerieVonck 15k Search 33 2005-10-31 22:54
Stats updates SandStar NFSNET Discussion 7 2004-07-03 22:59

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:53.


Fri Aug 6 21:53:17 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:22, 1 user, load averages: 2.96, 2.65, 2.55

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.