![]() |
|
|
#320 |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
Just something that I've been thinking about - would it be possible to add a driver recognition system to aliqueit, and let it alert you when you acquire or escape a driver (including the downdriver)? I presume it wouldn't be much use below, say, 80 digits, but above, it could be good for detecting records - they don't always get spotted...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#321 | |
|
Feb 2004
1000000102 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#322 |
|
Sep 2009
23·3 Posts |
bsquared:
My mistake: the CF was 103 not 85, sorry. I have a very very few things that i wrote to try understand the qs and try optimize this process. Can I send one Pm for you, with my "work", for your analysis? P.S: that's one very very iniiant analisys. Again, thank you for your attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
#323 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
67018 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#324 |
|
Sep 2009
23·3 Posts |
Yes, I was.
I sent now 2 Pm's for you. Thank you very much for your attention and patience, and the time and patience of 10metreh and mklasson too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#325 |
|
Jun 2008
Wollongong, .au
3·61 Posts |
Is there a way to force aliqueit.exe to continue running a sequence even if it's apparently merged with an earlier sequence? Am playing with some miscellaneous numbers, and every two steps I need to start a new aliquiet <num> command to continue the sequence. The earlier sequence isn't "known", so it's a bit frustrating.
Edit: Looking in the aliqueit.ini file, setting detect_merge = false looks to be the trick! Last fiddled with by paleseptember on 2009-09-30 at 05:16 Reason: Worked it out myself, rah me! |
|
|
|
|
|
#326 |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
3×281 Posts |
For anything with ecm, one example does not tell you much. ecm is a gamble. More ecm will be faster for some numbers and slower for other numbers.
Since aliqueit has ecm, it will sometimes be faster and sometime slower. What matters is what happens overall which is harder to measure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#327 | |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
9B216 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#328 |
|
May 2009
Dedham Massachusetts USA
3·281 Posts |
I have found a single constant doesn't work that well. I see a reference to minrels.txt file in factmsieve.pl which is what you are talking about? If this is better than a single constant, does anyone have such a file with reasonable values set? I think it would be faster if I could use a smaller falue for the low end and bigger for the high end.
Last fiddled with by Greebley on 2009-11-04 at 18:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
#329 | |
|
Jan 2009
Ireland
18610 Posts |
im having trouble with this at the moment.i keep getting this error when it goes to use yafu.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#330 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
My guess: It's looking in C:\Documents and Settings\X\ for files that are in C:\Documents and Settings\XXXXXXX\aliqueit108\aliqueit108\ Run it from the aliqueit108 directory (or in a way that makes it look there, like with a shortcut with the proper settings, or adding aliqueit's directory to the PATH variable) and it should work right.
Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-12-26 at 01:31 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Resuming aliqueit | johnadam74 | Aliquot Sequences | 4 | 2016-03-28 12:32 |
| Apparent aliqueit issue with specifying factors | pakaran | Aliquot Sequences | 2 | 2015-09-12 23:10 |
| Using Several Instances of Aliqueit for a large gnfs job | EdH | Aliquot Sequences | 6 | 2011-12-13 18:58 |
| Setting up aliqueit | science_man_88 | Aliquot Sequences | 185 | 2011-11-08 12:18 |
| Tried out aliqueit.exe: ggnfs failing | Greebley | Aliquot Sequences | 35 | 2010-02-13 15:23 |