mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2010-02-22, 05:42   #848
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

1000010100002 Posts
Default

I've run 9400 curves at B1=11e7 so far.
frmky is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 05:58   #849
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,497 Posts
Default

That is a lot, about ~t51 already.
So it's not too early.

I'll take msieve -np 24001,30000 chunk. No, probably won't have time.
A 2.1e-13 poly would be nice.
(For another c171, I have a 1.7e-13 poly from 1-48000 and not satisfied.)
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 06:08   #850
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

24·7·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrk View Post
I will reserve -np 120060,144000
I've started 1 to 120000 on 4 GPUs.
frmky is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 06:15   #851
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2×17×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
That is a lot, about ~t51 already.
So it's not too early.
Is my guess about right, that we need approx. t55 or t56?
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 06:38   #852
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

100101000110012 Posts
Default

It's 125 CPU* days to do a t55.
And 750 CPU days to do gnfs.
It all depends on how much one believes in luck, available resources etc...
If the ECM CPU time was free (PS3), why not even run a t60 I'd say.
____
*some CPU
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 06:47   #853
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

3×5×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
A 2.1e-13 poly would be nice.
Or would it?

Code:
$ grep norm msieve.dat.p |sort -g -k7 -r|head
# norm 1.035357e-16 alpha -6.929733 e 2.847e-13
# norm 9.877354e-17 alpha -6.825118 e 2.760e-13
# norm 9.784672e-17 alpha -6.845675 e 2.750e-13
# norm 9.654567e-17 alpha -6.966033 e 2.721e-13
# norm 9.629041e-17 alpha -6.892626 e 2.719e-13
# norm 9.545591e-17 alpha -8.033764 e 2.686e-13
# norm 9.254898e-17 alpha -6.656010 e 2.655e-13
# norm 9.102714e-17 alpha -6.975543 e 2.621e-13
# norm 9.166923e-17 alpha -8.127207 e 2.615e-13
# norm 9.038645e-17 alpha -6.796628 e 2.607e-13
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 07:01   #854
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

251916 Posts
Default

Nice flare. I guess you can safely call me a man of low standards.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 08:36   #855
schickel
 
schickel's Avatar
 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville

2·1,061 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrk View Post
Is it too early to start organizing a GPU poly search for the c171?
What's it going to take to do the post-processing?
schickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 09:08   #856
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,497 Posts
Default

It may fit in 4Gb memory, barely, if oversieving is right. (a gnfs-174 needed about 5Gb.)
6Gb+ will be a safer bet. In any case, a 64-bit OS.
10-12M to a side matrix and 10 days BL, probably less on an i7.
Note: during BL the computer will be challenging for daily use.
Low standards will help to cope.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 09:39   #857
schickel
 
schickel's Avatar
 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville

1000010010102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
It may fit in 4Gb memory, barely, if oversieving is right. (a gnfs-174 needed about 5Gb.)
6Gb+ will be a safer bet. In any case, a 64-bit OS.
10-12M to a side matrix and 10 days BL, probably less on an i7.
Note: during BL the computer will be challenging for daily use.
Low standards will help to cope.
Well, seeing as how I don't have an i7, I will offer my system up only if no one else steps forward with something more capable.....

As long as I can step the priority down on msieve, it should be fine, I don't play many of the latest FPS games.

PS. Ignore the low WEI, that's because I'm running the stock MB graphics, not a super high octane, cutting edge GPU...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	SysInfo.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	15.3 KB
ID:	4767  
schickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-22, 10:33   #858
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23·11·73 Posts
Default

2000@11e7 produced no factor, unsurprisingly.

I have computation coming out of my ears, but since my Internet download speed has dropped to 40kbytes/second it would probably take me as long to download the relations as to run the matrix :(

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2010-02-22 at 10:39
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366 RichD Aliquot Sequences 470 2021-04-22 02:17
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3408 RichD Aliquot Sequences 474 2021-03-07 20:28
Reserved for MF - Sequence 276 kar_bon Aliquot Sequences 127 2020-12-17 10:05
Assignments are reserved but not showing up prism019 GPU to 72 6 2020-09-21 22:11
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved petrw1 Lone Mersenne Hunters 82 2010-01-11 01:57

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:23.


Fri Aug 6 22:23:58 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:52, 1 user, load averages: 3.69, 3.41, 3.22

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.