mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2009-12-04, 19:25   #617
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

3·5·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrk View Post
+150 curves @ B1=110000000, B2=1589211473866
I completed another 240 curves @ those limits. Still no factor.

The total curves done are about 1.8 * t50.
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-04, 19:37   #618
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2×17×73 Posts
Default

I have started an overnight run of p-1 (B1=1e10, B2=1e16, resuming from my yesterday's 1e10/1e15 run) a few hours ago, I guess it will finish around midnight (CET)

Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 2009-12-04 at 19:37 Reason: typo
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-04, 19:58   #619
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

3×5×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
with (14e, 30-bit lpa/lpr, alim=rlim=50e6)
I checked 29 vs 30 bit, 14e vs 15e and alim=rlim=25e6 vs 50e6 vs 75e6.

30 bit, 14e and alim=rlim=50e6 indeed appears to be the winner.
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-04, 20:07   #620
bsquared
 
bsquared's Avatar
 
"Ben"
Feb 2007

352010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrk View Post
I do.

Code:
n: 22315086009543699881696673140311700365075401903410041991888847307663799610560235574994125636703013521384678857814894314475474921423859163748271799984152025524899
# norm 1.050714e-15 alpha -7.337146 e 1.121e-12
skew: 25520528.70
c0:  31410679515197091100341643412427401243420
c1:  4180601981543089138092261003493340
c2: -2347505003114131780984812301
c3: -51235139041477161474
c4:  3624790086036
c5:  7560
Y0: -19679511428703587012905042402449
Y1:  492226961856379171
rlim: 50000000
alim: 50000000
lpbr: 30
lpba: 30
mfbr: 60
mfba: 60
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6

14e is faster.
Is everyone done poly searching then? I'll start on 10M-20M if so. Andi_47, I'll happily kill the jobs if you turn up a factor.
bsquared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-04, 20:16   #621
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

3·5·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsquared View Post
Is everyone done poly searching then? I'll start on 10M-20M if so. Andi_47, I'll happily kill the jobs if you turn up a factor.
I have stopped poly searching, but not sure if Tom has.
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-04, 21:26   #622
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsquared View Post
Andi_47, I'll happily kill the jobs if you turn up a factor.
It went a bit faster than I thought; no factor to B1=1e10, B2=1e16. I will extend to B2=3e16, ETA ~10:30 a.m. (CET) tomorrow. (i.e. ~12 hours from now)
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-04, 21:28   #623
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23×11×73 Posts
Default

I've stopped searching, and interrupted my ECM after about 3500@4e7; will take 20M-40M for the sieving.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-05, 07:22   #624
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

91216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
I've stopped searching, and interrupted my ECM after about 3500@4e7; will take 20M-40M for the sieving.
Tom, what range of Q should we sieve?
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-05, 07:39   #625
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

44716 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
Tom, what range of Q should we sieve?
I am not Tom, but,

It will take as much as 50e6 or 60e6 of Q (so since bsquared started at 10e6, end at 60e6 or 70e6) but my sieving test was limited so I may be a bit off.

Last fiddled with by jrk on 2009-12-05 at 07:51
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-05, 09:55   #626
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2×17×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
It went a bit faster than I thought; no factor to B1=1e10, B2=1e16. I will extend to B2=3e16, ETA ~10:30 a.m. (CET) tomorrow. (i.e. ~12 hours from now)
done, no factor.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-05, 10:39   #627
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

191816 Posts
Default

Yield looks a bit under 2 relations per Q; we need a bit over 100 million relations, so say 10M - 70M for the range.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366 RichD Aliquot Sequences 470 2021-04-22 02:17
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3408 RichD Aliquot Sequences 474 2021-03-07 20:28
Reserved for MF - Sequence 276 kar_bon Aliquot Sequences 127 2020-12-17 10:05
Assignments are reserved but not showing up prism019 GPU to 72 6 2020-09-21 22:11
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved petrw1 Lone Mersenne Hunters 82 2010-01-11 01:57

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:05.


Fri Aug 6 01:05:41 UTC 2021 up 13 days, 19:34, 1 user, load averages: 2.34, 2.40, 2.33

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.