![]() |
|
|
#2091 |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2·19·101 Posts |
+1213@43e6 (total: 8213)
I'll move up to 11e7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2092 |
|
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
7×89 Posts |
9500@11e7 done so far, and counting:
http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo//y_status_ecm.php |
|
|
|
|
|
#2093 |
|
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2094 |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
383810 Posts |
With the power of yoyo@home, is it even worth anything for me to run 11e7 curves? I'm only a little over 250 right now and one of my machines even refuses to do stage 2:
Code:
-> ___________________________________________________________________ -> | Running ecm.py, a Python driver for distributing GMP-ECM work | -> | on a single machine. It is Copyright, 2012, David Cleaver and | -> | is a conversion of factmsieve.py that is Copyright, 2010, Brian | -> | Gladman. Version 0.10 (Python 2.6 or later) 30th Sep 2012. | -> |_________________________________________________________________| -> Number(s) to factor: -> 17285154910805941577069464828335617544658066950627644021728302169526833018711670895092479561808160256160945139573800969912234390238908363042669550995167201537635764747005337 (173 digits) ->============================================================================= -> Working on number: 172851549108059415...537635764747005337 (173 digits) -> Currently working on: job0137.txt -> Starting 1 instance of GMP-ECM... -> ./ecm -c 100 110000000 < job0137.txt > job0137_t00.txt GMP-ECM 6.4.3 [configured with GMP 5.0.2] [ECM] Using B1=110000000, B2=776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), 1 thread Done 0/100; avg s/curve: stg1 4432s, stg2 n/a s; runtime: 4772s -> *** Error: unexpected return value: -9 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2095 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
251916 Posts |
Not really. Even if you would like to find a record factor, the conditional probability of success of any curve is dropping down to zero as I am typing... (Conditional on that yoyo@home already ran 10^4 curves at this moment and didn't find a factor.)
Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2013-02-25 at 23:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2096 |
|
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
7·89 Posts |
Will be 18000 curves @ 11e7 enough or is there more needed?
yoyo |
|
|
|
|
|
#2097 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
You could always ECM at a t80 level and go for a record ECM factorization
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2098 |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2×19×101 Posts |
The trouble for me is that as I increase B1, more and more machines fall by the wayside. At 43e7 more than half tell me to get lost. And, I just can't see my attention span lasting for that long anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2099 |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2×17×73 Posts |
If my estimation is correct (i.e. if I have no mistakes in my tables), ~2*t55 = 2*18k = 36k curves @11e7 are are needed for a c173.
Edit: I just see that you have queued 42k@26e7. This might be a bit of trying for record factorization, but why not... Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 2013-02-26 at 21:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2100 |
|
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
10011011112 Posts |
No factor found so far with 40k curves @26e7.
yoyo |
|
|
|
|
|
#2101 |
|
Oct 2010
191 Posts |
Code:
GMP-ECM 7.0-dev [configured with GMP 5.1.1, --enable-asm-redc, --enable-assert, --enable-openmp] [P-1] Input number is 17285154910805941577069464828335617544658066950627644021728302169526833018711670895092479561808160256160945139573800969912234390238908363042669550995167201537635764747005337 (173 digits) Using B1=100000000000, B2=484004602750364712, polynomial x^1, x0=4104192314 Step 1 took 24940729ms Step 2 took 40735246ms |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366 | RichD | Aliquot Sequences | 470 | 2021-04-22 02:17 |
| Reserved for MF - Sequence 3408 | RichD | Aliquot Sequences | 474 | 2021-03-07 20:28 |
| Reserved for MF - Sequence 276 | kar_bon | Aliquot Sequences | 127 | 2020-12-17 10:05 |
| Assignments are reserved but not showing up | prism019 | GPU to 72 | 6 | 2020-09-21 22:11 |
| 80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved | petrw1 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 82 | 2010-01-11 01:57 |