Aliquot sequence reservations

[fivemack]

Reserving 1412904

[ChristianB]

Dropping 1888560 1139124 1800894 1845390 1882692 1159032 1785582 1393080 1855020 1327128 1834464 1752492 1117266 1413036 1136640 1385712 1804242 1753794 1695568 1370562
Reserving 1700190 1697274 1761504 1674276 1706418 1685358 1652616 1740948 1757784 1753290 1744734 1749916 1720800 1705320 1724880 1736868 1759200 1673406 1753254 1580976 1749744 1751904 1553160 1684200

[fivemack]

Dropping 1173780 (2^2 * 7 * ECMed C113)

Dropping 1476654 (2^6 * 3, ECMed C113 cofactor)

[fivemack]

Taking 1470792 1600844

[fivemack]

Taking 1845624

[unconnected]

Taking 1916700, 1535616, 1529136, 1800486.

[fivemack]

Taking 594060

[fivemack]

Dropping 1352862 (2^2 * 3^3, ECMed C117)
Dropping 1178190 (2^6 * 3 * ECMed C121)

[VBCurtis]

I'm trying to learn CADO's knobs and buttons, and a steady supply of sub-150 digit GNFS candidates is useful for this. I've been cracking fivemack's fully-ECM'ed dropped reservations for the last week or so; is this bad form? I do not run the sequences after factoring his stopping point.

If one ever does something interesting, I'll PM Mr Womack with details.

[Dubslow]

Originally Posted by VBCurtis

I'm trying to learn CADO's knobs and buttons, and a steady supply of sub-150 digit GNFS candidates is useful for this. I've been cracking fivemack's fully-ECM'ed dropped reservations for the last week or so; is this bad form? I do not run the sequences after factoring his stopping point.

If one ever does something interesting, I'll PM Mr Womack with details.

I think it's fine. In the past I've done just-one-line-per-sequence type stuff before and never noticed any problems.

There's been some reports of reserved sequences being worked in parallel, but this seems to be dozens and hundreds of lines being worked on by some non-reservee. One-line-and-out like what you write should be perfectly fine.

[fivemack]

Dropping 1845624: 2^2 * 3 * fully-ECMed C115