![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Feb 2004
2·3·43 Posts |
Is the current cutoff for automatic ecm in msieve really optimal? (using the -e arg)
Given a C96 msieve does ecm for factors <= 25 digits, which takes <1 minute on this machine. The QS then takes about 100 minutes. My uninformed guess would be that a fair bit more ecm is warranted, but I don't know the math... There's no way to specify exactly how much ecm should be done, is there? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Nov 2008
2·33·43 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-03-08 at 17:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
3,541 Posts |
A full t30 would take 10-30 minutes, which is too long. Doing a fraction of an ECM level is a good idea, though.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quad Opteron sub-optimality | fivemack | Msieve | 2 | 2016-09-29 17:00 |
| Current recommended TF bit depth? | endless mike | GPU Computing | 3 | 2015-08-07 23:00 |
| Factoring bit depth? | Dubslow | Information & Answers | 103 | 2011-09-04 14:51 |
| Trial Factor Bit Depth | lavalamp | Operation Billion Digits | 8 | 2010-08-02 18:49 |
| Current Factor Depth | JHagerson | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 60 | 2007-06-17 22:35 |