![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mar 2007
179 Posts |
These exponents are at 62 bits. I will take them to 63 bits.
-- monst |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24×173 Posts |
It would perhaps have been more in line with LMH etiquette to have waited for Hasher to release the range or prod the mods to PM him to release the range.
Last fiddled with by garo on 2009-01-12 at 11:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Mar 2007
17910 Posts |
This range finished to 2^63
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 76.5-77M to 63 bits | lycorn | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2007-05-25 21:32 |
| 64 bits versus 32 bits Windows | S485122 | Software | 2 | 2006-10-31 19:14 |
| 47.1M to 47.5M to 62 bits | James Heinrich | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2006-07-01 02:12 |
| 35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits | Khemikal796 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 12 | 2005-12-01 21:35 |
| 32.8 - 32.9 to 62 bits | MrHappy | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 1 | 2005-08-04 16:36 |