![]() |
|
|
#155 |
|
Aug 2008
Good old Germany
8D16 Posts |
Done bothe. The email to you with success and switched off the authentication without.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
Here are changes from 2.2.0:
and from 2.2.1
You can d/l it from here. BTW, the 2.2.x client will only work with a 2.2.x server. 2.1.x clients will work a 2.2.x server. Last fiddled with by rogue on 2009-06-20 at 18:14 |
|
|
|
|
|
#157 | |
|
Aug 2008
Good old Germany
100011012 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
The twin prime search is only for k*b^2+/-1 numbers. The candidates file should contain that +1 form. The client will test the +1 form. If that is PRP or prime, then the client will also test the -1 form. If the +1 form is composite then a test for the -1 form is not required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
I think you mean n.
Or maybe k*2^n+/-1.Isn't it faster (at least with b=2) to check the -1 form? It would save time to check the -1 form first, then only check the +1 form if the -1 is PRP/prime. I know that LLR checks the -1 first, at least for b=2. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-06-24 at 12:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Actually, there is no speed difference between testing the -1 and +1 sides; thus, on a file sieved for a twin search (i.e. with factors removed from both sides), either side can be searched arbitrarily with no speed penalty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#161 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
Quote:
It has been my experience with LLR that Riesel's test faster than Proth's. Or are you referring to Phrot in this case? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
2003663613*2^195000-1 is prime! Time : 130.578 sec. 2003663613*2^195000+1 is prime! Time : 130.273 sec. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
18D016 Posts |
This is patch release to 2.2.1. The only changes are to the client:
You can d/l it from here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
186916 Posts |
I haven't done any actual testing, though I've heard this in a number of places. And, Mini-Geek's testing seems to bear out this theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#165 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24·397 Posts |
Here is a list of changes:
You can d/l it from here. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PRPNet 5.4.3 Released | rogue | Software | 178 | 2021-06-24 11:56 |
| PSP goes prpnet | ltd | Prime Sierpinski Project | 86 | 2012-06-06 02:30 |
| PRPNet 4.0.0 Released | rogue | Software | 84 | 2011-11-16 21:20 |
| PRPNet 4.0.1 Released | Joe O | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 1 | 2010-10-22 20:11 |
| PRPNet 3.0.0 Released | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 220 | 2010-10-12 20:48 |