![]() |
|
|
#56 |
|
Mar 2007
Austria
2·151 Posts |
No,sr2sieve has a -t option to run multiple threads. With that option you can just use one instance/folder/command and still use the 4 cores of a quad. Normally this is slower than running 4 instances,but when the sievefile is big,it can be faster.
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
The "care package" that I put together to get David started yesterday runs multiple instances using the -u switch--there are eight batch files in the sr2sieve folder, each with 1/8 of the total range. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
B2416 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
May 2007
Minnesota USA
72 Posts |
I'll take 8600-8800G.
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242338 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
11000011010012 Posts |
5850G-5900G is complete; factors are attached.
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2009-01-04 at 22:08 Reason: whoops, forgot the attachment |
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
Quote:
Just a note: I am still assuming that you will be done with the P=1.4T-1.8T range here in the next day or two, which is what I think you had previously said. Is that correct? I'll get the n=50K-200K portion of the 9th drive started when you're done. Thanks, Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
1400G - 1800G complete
results emailed Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2009-01-05 at 21:17 |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
I have now removed P=1.4T-1.8T factors from the file link in the 1st post of this thread. 80000+ factors total.
My sieving for P=1.8T-3.4T should be done by morning so I'll have a lot more factors to remove at that point. ![]() Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-01-06 at 02:38 |
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10AB16 Posts |
Would it be a problem in processing my factors if I drop that new file into my sieving to speed it up? Also I recall that the file can be dropped in over the old one without having to restart sr2sieve, is that right or am I mistaken?
Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-01-06 at 12:55 |
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #10 k=1400-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 61 | 2013-01-30 16:08 |
| Team drive #9 k=1005-2000 n=50K-350K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 236 | 2009-06-25 10:04 |
| Sieving drive for k=1003-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 160 | 2009-05-10 00:50 |
| k=1005-1400 n=200K-500K results fill in | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 55 | 2009-04-16 11:33 |
| Team drive #8 k=1400-2000 n=350K-500K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 101 | 2009-04-08 02:11 |