![]() |
|
|
#100 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
P=8800G-10000G is complete. no primes found
many possible primes were eliminated though! |
|
|
|
|
#101 |
|
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
21318 Posts |
Scrub a dub dub :thumbs:
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3·7·53 Posts |
sieve 1005-2000-200K-500K done, factors emailed to Gary.
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Sep 2004
B0E16 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
I was wondering if anyone would catch that. Funny thing...I actually started to type that out of habit and then said what the heck am I doing? Then I just went with it. lol If anyone finds a prime n>100K while sieving, let me know. We'll award you a gold medal! I say n>100K because srsieve will actually "announce" small primes on the screen if you sieve starting at an extremely low n-value like n=1. |
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Re-reserving Nugget's range of P=8200G-8600G. We can't wait any longer for it. Perhaps he'll show up midway through and I'll be able to stop. I think a quad will slay it fast enough. If not, I'll put 2 on it.
Gary |
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
I assume this is just because it sieves past the square root of the number without finding anything, right? How long would it take (I know it'll be way, way past the realm of practicality, and probably possibility as well) to confirm via sieving only, with sr*sieve or NewPGen or something, (maybe include Prime95?) that a number with n>100K is prime?
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
23·3·5·72 Posts |
Quote:
it doesnt do square root for some reason although it would be very nice if it did |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
Quote:
Henry is correct. For example, if you are sieving and just happen to have k*2^n-1 calculate to a value of 101; srsieve will not display it as prime until it has sieved to P=101. This is OK as far as I'm concerned because srsieve will actually correctly leave the pair in the sieve. sr1sieve and sr2sieve either barf at such a low pair or improperly remove them. NewPGen is extremely bad about that; it actually removes them from the sieve without saying a word. For that reason, I never use NewPGen anymore except for twin-prime sieving at higher n-ranges. Also, it's far too slow. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
54448 Posts |
4250G - 5850G Complete
Results emailed I still owe you 4050G - 4250G Sometime tonight |
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #10 k=1400-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 61 | 2013-01-30 16:08 |
| Team drive #9 k=1005-2000 n=50K-350K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 236 | 2009-06-25 10:04 |
| Sieving drive for k=1003-2000 n=500K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 160 | 2009-05-10 00:50 |
| k=1005-1400 n=200K-500K results fill in | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 55 | 2009-04-16 11:33 |
| Team drive #8 k=1400-2000 n=350K-500K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 101 | 2009-04-08 02:11 |