![]() |
|
|
#78 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
Reserving n=910K-930K for port 3000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Reserving 930K-940K for port 9000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Reserving n=940K-960K for port 3000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
1039510 Posts |
Max,
I need you to send me the file sieved to P=1405T for n=950K-1M for this drive. For now, I'll go ahead and load n=940K-950K into port 3000 awaiting the file for loading n=950K-960K. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
I got sidetracked with some important stuff in "real life" so I didn't get to send it to you until now.Meanwhile, reserving 960K-970K for port 9000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Jan 2005
Sydney, Australia
5×67 Posts |
What happens when we get to 1M?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
We won't hit it with the rally but when we do, we'll do the same thing that we did when transitioning from the 5th to 6th drive; only we will transition from the 6th to 7th drive. To be specific: We'll dry out the current port on the 7th drive and use ports 3000 and 9000 to finish it up with "regular" (non-rally) and rally searches. In other words, if people want to stay on with their machines after the rally like they did last time to complete the drive, we want the transition from the 6th to the 7th drive to be as seemless as possible.
Since we're going through the drives so fast with the rallies, I may ask people if they want to start a lower-priority new drive for k=400-600/n>1M just as soon as we're done with the 6th drive. That will give people 2 choices for tests n>1M and 3 choices for tests n>~750K. But if we do that, we'll continue to push k=800-1001 (7th drive) with rallies and the such until we're complete with it to n=1M. Once we are done with the 7th drive, k=1400-2000 (currently at n=~685K) becomes the priority. It is my hope to keep that range from going the way of the k=2000-3000 and 3000-3400 ranges that fell victim to the rapidly rising 5000th-place prime. I think we can do it with a sufficient number of rallies and non-rally participation. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2011-01-08 at 05:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
Reserving n=970K-990K for port 3000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
Reserving n=990K-1M for port 3000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
207710 Posts |
Has someone taken the primes out of the file?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
Which file are you talking about? If you mean the one at http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/llrnet/primes_3000.txt, they're still there--maybe you tried to load it right on a 15-minute interval when it was being updated?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 127 | 2011-07-15 14:25 |
| Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 135 | 2010-11-23 14:27 |
| Team drive #1: k=400-1001 n=333.2K-600K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 675 | 2009-02-24 16:37 |
| Team drive #3: k=300-400 n=260K-600K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 255 | 2008-11-12 10:43 |
| Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 38 | 2008-10-22 16:20 |