Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M - Page 4

gd_barnes · 2009-01-20, 16:08

Attached are 24 of the 26 missing port 400 results from my machines as they were processed on the server. Sheesh, that was a pain pulling 1-2 results each off of 20+ cores.

The only reason I took an hour to do this: This confirms without a doubt that the server properly handed out the pairs and properly received them back but somehow in the transition to the results page, they got lost.

David, I wonder if they are still sitting in a file on your machine somewhere? Or perhaps the results files on your machine are deleted after they are posted on the web page?

Max, the only pairs that I didn't do were the first two for n=612947 and 612953. I'm confident that those were done on glennpat's machine(s) so you'll need to run those.

Gary

mdettweiler · 2009-01-20, 16:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Attached are 24 of the 26 missing port 400 results from my machines as they were processed on the server. Sheesh, that was a pain pulling 1-2 results each off of 20+ cores.

The only reason I took an hour to do this: This confirms without a doubt that the server properly handed out the pairs and properly received them back but somehow in the transition to the results page, they got lost.

David, I wonder if they are still sitting in a file on your machine somewhere? Or perhaps the results files on your machine are deleted after they are posted on the web page?

Max, the only pairs that I didn't do were the first two for n=612947 and 612953. I'm confident that those were done on glennpat's machine(s) so you'll need to run those.

Gary

Hmm...interesting. I'm surprised that the server actually accepted the results and didn't just send them to the rejected bin as I would expect.

Anyway, don't worry, I'll get everything sorted out with the results processing now--thanks for re-doing those results, I'll incorporate those results into my processing job so that should leave at maximum only two missing results which I can easily do myself.

Max

gd_barnes · 2009-01-20, 16:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdettweiler

Hmm...interesting. I'm surprised that the server actually accepted the results and didn't just send them to the rejected bin as I would expect.

Anyway, don't worry, I'll get everything sorted out with the results processing now--thanks for re-doing those results, I'll incorporate those results into my processing job so that should leave at maximum only two missing results which I can easily do myself.

Max

??????

Are you skimming my posts again? lol I didn't redo the results. Check again.

mdettweiler · 2009-01-20, 18:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

??????

Are you skimming my posts again? lol I didn't redo the results. Check again.

Oh! I get it now...yes, I admit, I did skim your post.

You can expect to see the results for 606.2K-615K sometime later today.

mdettweiler · 2009-01-21, 23:59

LLRnet IB400 has completed 606.2K-615K; lresults emailed to Gary.

IronBits · 2009-01-22, 00:24

IB400 will be completed very soon, then the port will be moved to
IB4000 forever.

Mini-Geek · 2009-01-22, 12:04

605-606 complete, 2 primes already reported, lresults attached.

gd_barnes · 2009-01-22, 13:48

Reserving n=625K-635K for David's new port 4000.

As soon as the current range is complete, which should be later today, anyone on port 400 should switch over to port 4000 after David has loaded the file.

Gary

em99010pepe · 2009-01-23, 11:53

Are you watching the Australian Open, Federer vs Safin?

gd_barnes · 2009-01-24, 07:24

I deleted my bad post about port 400 vs. 4000 as well as responses to it to avoid any confusion of new people. Thanks all for the explanation!

MyDogBuster · 2009-01-26, 19:36

615-616 complete 1 prime already reported

616-617 complete 1 prime already reported

Results emailed

2009-01-26, 19:36	#44
MyDogBuster May 2008 Wilmington, DE 2²×23×31 Posts	615-616 complete 1 prime already reported 616-617 complete 1 prime already reported Results emailed Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2009-01-26 at 19:40

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Team drive #7 k=800-1001 n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	127	2011-07-15 14:25
Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	89	2011-03-10 12:34
Team drive #1: k=400-1001 n=333.2K-600K	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	675	2009-02-24 16:37
Team drive #3: k=300-400 n=260K-600K	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	255	2008-11-12 10:43
Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	38	2008-10-22 16:20

2009-01-21, 23:59	#38
mdettweiler A Sunny Moo Aug 2007 USA (GMT-5) 3·2,083 Posts	LLRnet IB400 has completed 606.2K-615K; lresults emailed to Gary.

2009-01-22, 00:24	#39
IronBits I ♥ BOINC! Oct 2002 Glendale, AZ. (USA) 3·7·53 Posts	IB400 will be completed very soon, then the port will be moved to IB4000 forever.

2009-01-22, 13:48	#41
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³·5·7·11 Posts	Reserving n=625K-635K for David's new port 4000. As soon as the current range is complete, which should be later today, anyone on port 400 should switch over to port 4000 after David has loaded the file. Gary

2009-01-23, 11:53	#42
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2830₁₀ Posts	Are you watching the Australian Open, Federer vs Safin?

2009-01-24, 07:24	#43
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	I deleted my bad post about port 400 vs. 4000 as well as responses to it to avoid any confusion of new people. Thanks all for the explanation!