![]() |
|
|
#683 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11000110101002 Posts |
Quote:
You will have to use the second version I posted as it will output pl_remain.txt correctly (the first version was missing *b^n+c" on each line. It might be worth considering running srbsieve to n=100 (with two more phases) and compare with new-base.txt to n=100 and verify those as well. Gary makes the final call on what is acceptable. Last fiddled with by rogue on 2015-07-16 at 20:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#684 | |
|
Jul 2003
11438 Posts |
Quote:
"i can do a range of 100M - 20,000,000,002 to 20,100,000,000 if you like" was meant only as an offer (as a range of 1G is too big for me) you reserved about 1 hour later this range officially so i decided not to do this range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#685 | |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
2·3·7·23 Posts |
Quote:
Again thanks for your feedback
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#686 | |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
96610 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Looking forward to be hearing what Gary comes back with, but I might consider running to n=300 and thereby include phase 1 and phase 2 in srbsieve after removing newpgen found primes for n<=24. Unless Gary would like otherwise, I do believe a test to n=300 is sufficient, since I have now almost completed a flawless test through 6 phases to n=25K for version 1 of srbsieve, so since it is for comparison only, I think n=300 makes perfect sence. Gary? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#687 |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
2·3·7·23 Posts |
Officially reserving:
k=20,100,000,002 to k=23,000,000,000 for my Hasswell. Work has been prepared for this range. I'm gonna use srbsieve Version 4 and PFGW version 3.7.9 Completed using srbsieve Version 2 and PFGW version 3.7.9 is the following range: k=20,000,000,002 to k=20,100,000,000 with following stats: 35,440,051 primes 14,559,376 MOB's 573 remains 50,000,000 Total Result files will be sent as soon as upload to my Google drive completes
Last fiddled with by KEP on 2015-07-20 at 11:31 |
|
|
|
|
|
#688 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2×2,437 Posts |
Taking 63G and up to test srbsieve for myself. I'll run to at least 50k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#689 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2·2,437 Posts |
The test was indeed quick (at 43k now, still running with just 50 k's left). I'm ready to tackle a 1G range to 25k. What file-transfer services are the preferred standards these days? How large a chunk can I srbsieve at once without making files too big to transfer? I already built the newpgen files for 62-63G, which are enormous! (over 15GB).
Taking 62-63G. Also, is there a resume feature at some stage of srbsieve? i'm nervous my laptop won't finish a 250 or 500M chunk of srbsieve without a restart. |
|
|
|
|
|
#690 |
|
Sep 2011
Germany
26·32·5 Posts |
Reserving R3 from n=100-150k (4-5G) for BOINC
|
|
|
|
|
|
#691 | |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
3C616 Posts |
Quote:
Sieve k=62,000,000,001 to k=63,000,000,000 to n=XX using NewPGen, you can sieve the entire 1G range at once, since it won't slow srbsieve down, compared to the time saved on sieving. After sieving, prepare 10 ranges, or what ever you are comfortable running and then start running the ranges 1 by 1 untill you complete all of them. If you compress the pl_MOB.txt, pl_remain.txt and pl_prime.txt files, produced by srbsieve, using WinRAR then your compressed .rar file will be approximately 800MB to 1GB. I use GoogleDrive to send the compressed files to Gary, but other people may have other suggestions, however GoogleDrive is very reliable and transfers as fast as Gary can download the files sent to him. Hope this helped you and welcome aboard the effort to bring R3 to it's knees. I'll continue move from the bottom and up, but will you continue towards the bottom from the top? If you do, then we can meet like the people digging a tunnel in 3-5 months time and declare R3 completely tested to n>=25K ![]() Take care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#692 |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
17068 Posts |
Range 20,000,000,002 to 23,000,000,000 is close to complete. (Saturday or sunday)
I'm currently preparing work for k=23,000,000,002 to k=27,000,000,000 to n=25K, so therefor I'm officially reserving k=23G-27G. |
|
|
|
|
|
#693 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32×13×89 Posts |
Quote:
Here is what works easiest for me for bases 3/7/15 for very large k-ranges: 1. Test to n=25K before sending anything. (I assume that you will be doing this.) 2. Send me all the k's remaining in one file. It won't be too big. 3. Divide the primes up into approximately k=100M or 200M files and zip them. 4. Upload all the zip files to google drive. 5. Send me a link to the google drive file. If you want, you can skip uploading the k's remaining to google drive and just send me the file by itself. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2015-08-14 at 04:29 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1398 | 2021-08-06 12:49 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2305 | 2021-08-04 15:09 |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1693 | 2021-08-01 08:40 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 908 | 2021-08-01 07:48 |
| Sierp base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 388 | 2020-10-21 19:42 |