![]() |
|
|
#1013 |
|
Oct 2009
Oulu, Finland
2×3×5 Posts |
I found a problem from the DB.
http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000217043267 This 7 digit number 1210012 is fully factored, but its status is still "C". |
|
|
|
|
|
#1014 |
|
Sep 2010
Scandinavia
3·5·41 Posts |
It's the '%' again. It has been discussed earlier in the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1015 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
10110111111102 Posts |
Yes http://factordb.com/index.php?query=1210012 is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1016 |
|
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
2·7·132 Posts |
Is there a way to get the database's known factorizations of the form p^q-1, p an odd prime, q a prime?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1017 |
|
Oct 2009
Oulu, Finland
2·3·5 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1018 | |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
22×727 Posts |
Quote:
There're several terms listed, including Cunningham numbers b^n-1. Choose 'Show' to get the screen of this table. Deselect "b is even" and "b is composite", n is set to 1 by default (fill in a different value if needed) and click 'Show' to update the results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1019 |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
Sequence 84822 is broken, see here: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=14859
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1020 | |
|
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
2×7×132 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1021 |
|
Dec 2009
89 Posts |
I've noticed that the database erroneously omits some small factors of the following 77-digit numbers:
Code:
80978084394598568390520920252440060895670346459831516622284554518849503146397 82609404176288347510975214065063503631619108607371480044587508148396968704911 88236918639719858997946921372584311423090252002347982879826766163694271697843 88894857952232839709785628818457172955757575436001096904562755715875193607509 92250106588933435730861605431146390431716761868772836262451636991161111409211 96219970786531934764768710647149833037379504561939264511368166182316972958369 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1022 |
|
Dec 2009
89 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1023 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
@Syd: just curious, what program are you using for N-1 and N+1 tests? I tried putting in a known small-ish prime with a trivial N+1 factorization (50633872*3^25032-1) to have the DB take a whack at it, and it somewhere in the vicinity of 12-20 minutes to do the N+1 test. My computer took just 90 seconds to do it even with the old (1.2) version of PFGW, so I'm guessing you must be using something different.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Database for k-b-b's: | 3.14159 | Miscellaneous Math | 325 | 2016-04-09 17:45 |
| Factoring database issues | Mini-Geek | Factoring | 5 | 2009-07-01 11:51 |
| database.zip | HiddenWarrior | Data | 1 | 2004-03-29 03:53 |
| Database layout | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 1 | 2003-01-18 00:49 |
| Is there a performance database? | Joe O | Lounge | 35 | 2002-09-06 20:19 |