mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > FactorDB

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-03-15, 14:07   #111
Syd
 
Syd's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany

2·5·23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
The text format:
1. Could you make it write the full numbers instead of "P86" and the like?
2. Sometimes the factors are written backwards!
3. A big bug: when there is a power of 2 (or another number), the text format will only give "2", instead of "2^2".
Now it looks a little bit more like the .ELF files
Syd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-15, 18:07   #112
schickel
 
schickel's Avatar
 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville

2×1,061 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Syd View Post
Hi Frank,

I've added a simple compact text output, is it what you expected?
That's perfect. Awesome job on this.
schickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-19, 00:43   #113
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Workers 13-16 appear to be "offline" according to the worker status page--and if memory serves they've been like that since last night. I've seen this happen before but it was always corrected in somewhat short order; Syd, do you know what's going on here?
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-19, 06:18   #114
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

624910 Posts
Default

Small feature request for the workers: could we have a button for doing P-1 and 3 runs of P+1 all in one step? None of those steps take very long individually, so most of the time spent doing them is the human effort involved in waiting for the one job to finish, then starting the next one, etc.

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2009-03-19 at 06:19
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-19, 10:24   #115
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

29·41 Posts
Default

The P-1 and P+1 bound might also be a bit larger than 1M
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-20, 23:05   #116
Syd
 
Syd's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany

2×5×23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Workers 13-16 appear to be "offline" according to the worker status page--and if memory serves they've been like that since last night. I've seen this happen before but it was always corrected in somewhat short order; Syd, do you know what's going on here?
They were (and are now) offline because I need the CPU time to do some sieving jobs on sequence 162126. Everything is working fine.

Quote:
The P-1 and P+1 bound might also be a bit larger than 1M
Quote:
could we have a button for doing P-1 and 3 runs of P+1 all in one step?
Going to change this two.
Syd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-21, 07:16   #117
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

29·41 Posts
Default

What about a limit on the "ECM very high limits". I think it doesn't make sense to run 4000 curves with B1=1M

Last fiddled with by smh on 2009-03-21 at 07:17
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-21, 08:35   #118
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23·3·5·72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smh View Post
What about a limit on the "ECM very high limits". I think it doesn't make sense to run 4000 curves with B1=1M
yes a limit of 1000 curves would be good

when doing a sequence search would it be possible in the show pane to have options to show only numbers with the largest composite cofactor below x(a textbox input?) or/and have an option to sort numbers by the size of the remaining cofactor with smallest at the top?
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-21, 10:53   #119
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smh View Post
What about a limit on the "ECM very high limits". I think it doesn't make sense to run 4000 curves with B1=1M
But what if someone wanted to run a number up to the full 40 digit level (9000 curves according to the worker status page)? In that case a limit of 4000 curves (or smaller) would end up being more of an annoying limitation than anything.

Now, possibly a limit of 9000 curves would work better; that would ensure that runaway jobs don't steal too much of Syd's personal time on the worker machines. If users really, really wanted to run more, of course, they still could, but then again, most of the time a very high limits job will be stopped long before 9000 curves anyway due to other jobs coming in.

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2009-03-21 at 10:55
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-21, 16:03   #120
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

29·41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
But what if someone wanted to run a number up to the full 40 digit level (9000 curves according to the worker status page)? In that case a limit of 4000 curves (or smaller) would end up being more of an annoying limitation than anything.
B1=1M is not optimal for finding 40 digit factors. You should increase to B1=3M.

A small example running a curve with B1=1M and B1=3M on a c106 using th e-v output of GMP-ECM.

B1=1M
Code:
Expected number of curves to find a factor of n digits:
20      25      30      35      40      45      50
5       20      118     904     8613    97057   1270662

Expected time to find a factor of n digits:
20      25      30      35      40      45      50
30.64s  2.21m   13.18m  1.69h   16.09h  7.55d   98.89d
B1=3M
Code:
Expected number of curves to find a factor of n digits
20      25      30      35      40      45      50
3       11      54      322     2350    20265   199745
Expected time to find a factor of n digits:

20      25      30      35      40      45      50
58.99s  3.41m   16.07m  1.60h   11.67h  4.19d   41.33d
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-21, 16:18   #121
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23×3×5×72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smh View Post
B1=1M is not optimal for finding 40 digit factors. You should increase to B1=3M.

A small example running a curve with B1=1M and B1=3M on a c106 using th e-v output of GMP-ECM.

B1=1M
Code:
Expected number of curves to find a factor of n digits:
20      25      30      35      40      45      50
5       20      118     904     8613    97057   1270662

Expected time to find a factor of n digits:
20      25      30      35      40      45      50
30.64s  2.21m   13.18m  1.69h   16.09h  7.55d   98.89d
B1=3M
Code:
Expected number of curves to find a factor of n digits
20      25      30      35      40      45      50
3       11      54      322     2350    20265   199745
Expected time to find a factor of n digits:

20      25      30      35      40      45      50
58.99s  3.41m   16.07m  1.60h   11.67h  4.19d   41.33d
note that the time for 35 digits is also lower with a bound of 3M
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Database for k-b-b's: 3.14159 Miscellaneous Math 325 2016-04-09 17:45
Factoring database issues Mini-Geek Factoring 5 2009-07-01 11:51
database.zip HiddenWarrior Data 1 2004-03-29 03:53
Database layout Prime95 PrimeNet 1 2003-01-18 00:49
Is there a performance database? Joe O Lounge 35 2002-09-06 20:19

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:11.


Sat Jul 17 12:11:07 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 9:58, 1 user, load averages: 1.12, 1.44, 1.39

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.