![]() |
|
|
#1090 |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1091 | |
|
Mar 2006
1DF16 Posts |
Quote:
Also, when submitting gmp-ecm output, what all should be included? Should it be: --------------------------------------------------- GMP-ECM 6.3 [configured with GMP 5.0.1] [ECM] Input number is 189620700613125325959116839007395234454467716598457179234021 Using B1=3000000, B2=5706890290, polynomial Dickson(6), sigma=4282141129 ********** Factor found in step 2: 282174488599599500573849980909 Found probable prime factor of 30 digits: 282174488599599500573849980909 Probable prime cofactor 671998030559713968361666935769 has 30 digits --------------------------------------------------- Or more? Or less? Also, do you save what version of gmp-ecm was used? And, if someone submits an ecm/p-1/p+1 for an existing number (that either does or does not already have an existing ecm/p-1/p+1 entry), does the new entry overwrite/update the existing factor? Or do you just save this info for new numbers? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1092 | |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
Quote:
I only save the sigma, b1/b2 bounds, submission time and the user (if logged in). There can only be one ecm/p+1/p-1-result per prime, and thats the one submitted first. I store this not only for new primes, also on already existing numbers. You can either paste the gmp-ecm output inside the report box (needs input number, prime found + parameters in it) or open the ecm-window on this number and enter the parameters manually. I tested this for quite a few numbers/outputs, so hopefully its bugfree Last fiddled with by Syd on 2011-05-22 at 21:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1093 |
|
Sep 2010
Scandinavia
3·5·41 Posts |
Doesn't work for factors found with Brent-Suyama's extension, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1094 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
111001102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1095 |
|
Sep 2010
Scandinavia
11478 Posts |
OK. Sounds like you're working on that(?)
Would it be realistic, btw, to do some basic ecm/p+1/p-1 automatically? Like TF. p.s. Great work with the db, I really appreciate it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1096 |
|
Apr 2011
4016 Posts |
For numbers less than 50 digits it's easy enough to grab thousands at once to batch process but for numbers greater than 50 digits, is there any way to get large quantities of them at once? Or just one at a time? Might be a nice feature to put in sometime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1097 |
|
May 2009
2·33 Posts |
Any chance that factors that were submitted for sequences be redone on your end? I had a hard drive crash and lost several days of data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1098 | |||
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
E616 Posts |
Thats something I have to read more about first.
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Redone? If you submitted them, you can get em back. Or did I not understand your question? |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#1099 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
111001102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1100 | |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2·19·101 Posts |
Quote:
Sorry, if I was that source of the "random" numbers. It was neither foreseen nor intentional. I wonder if it might not actually be good to have the db initiate an aliquot sequence simply by querying for a non-existent one... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Database for k-b-b's: | 3.14159 | Miscellaneous Math | 325 | 2016-04-09 17:45 |
| Factoring database issues | Mini-Geek | Factoring | 5 | 2009-07-01 11:51 |
| database.zip | HiddenWarrior | Data | 1 | 2004-03-29 03:53 |
| Database layout | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 1 | 2003-01-18 00:49 |
| Is there a performance database? | Joe O | Lounge | 35 | 2002-09-06 20:19 |