![]() |
|
|
#309 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
2A1C16 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#310 |
|
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany
2·5·53 Posts |
Well ... P-1 factoring someone evidently:
Code:
James 49733791 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:02AM 1.4 2.3971 1873455465277893886657 James 49718873 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:02AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49760719 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:01AM 1.3 2.2127 B1=720000 James 49736749 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:01AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49731637 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:01AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49728817 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:00AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49745867 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:59AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49745783 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:59AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49762367 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:59AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49750123 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:58AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49737487 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:57AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49744759 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:57AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49737341 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:56AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49728431 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49695941 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49745767 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49694527 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49735243 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 2320090676794788214983031 James 49755631 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:54AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49746061 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49721137 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49709059 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49719533 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49717991 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:53AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49720609 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49755301 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49738253 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49724491 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49755001 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:52AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49726351 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:51AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49734731 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:51AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49697591 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:50AM 1.4 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49736213 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:50AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 James 49714741 NF-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:50AM 1.3 2.3971 B1=780000 ... James 49733791 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 10:02AM 1.4 2.3971 1873455465277893886657 James 49735243 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:55AM 1.3 2.3971 2320090676794788214983031 James 49694221 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:47AM 1.4 2.3971 19897296723709230312073 James 49735159 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:15AM 1.3 2.3971 130270369806066541807579529 James 49731991 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:15AM 1.3 2.2127 606817814279085330295297951 James 49712599 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:08AM 1.3 2.3971 665269573812930208559 James 49753673 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 9:01AM 1.3 2.3971 1830345955745895021825961 James 49734983 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:59AM 1.3 2.3971 2254226350401960940822777 James 49746911 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:53AM 1.3 2.3971 6225812995736920681297 James 49735601 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:47AM 1.3 2.3971 192228443391170402259583 James 49751551 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:45AM 1.3 2.3971 1531872169111388854591 James 49711799 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:42AM 1.3 2.3971 1595041353334303484017 James 49693729 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:37AM 1.4 2.3971 13763588060427270801487 James 49711357 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 8:05AM 1.3 2.3971 5478842329678065907384351 James 49733491 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:57AM 1.3 2.3971 1761687596162411475572071 James 49699061 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:54AM 1.3 2.3971 440390638088971166607359 James 49703873 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:48AM 1.3 2.3971 675367201520896543229140177 James 49698029 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:48AM 1.3 2.3971 5695221164268402380212483903 James 49751543 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:34AM 1.2 2.2127 362174978092767293949951199 James 49692551 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:11AM 1.3 2.3971 929292757341394592683969 James 49711069 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 7:04AM 1.3 2.3971 17433694601052115837177 James 49720571 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 6:09AM 1.2 2.3971 172777740921678338696039 James 49702699 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 6:05AM 1.2 2.3971 1991631071405905203961 James 49689193 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 5:49AM 1.3 2.3971 2600251274417877949049 James 49700501 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 5:29AM 1.2 2.3971 191157995127878667937921 James 49690057 F-PM1 Feb 12 2010 3:51AM 1.2 2.3971 626003563005653533993
|
|
|
|
|
|
#311 |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
2·23·37 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#312 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
22·691 Posts |
But given that stage2 is lagging behind, something is probably better than nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313 |
|
Feb 2003
2×3×29 Posts |
I just broke into the top 100 for P-1!
Reminds me of the brief period in 1996 when I made the top 100 overall with only my P200
|
|
|
|
|
|
#314 |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
22×3×17×23 Posts |
I have one PC that so far in 2010 has done 30 Large P-1 tests with 5 successes (almost 17%).
It has allocated about 800M of RAM and estimates success in the 6.6% range. It has also crashed Prime95 twice while submitting a F-PM1 result. Are F-PM1 factors verified before being accepted? i.e. Do I simply have a statistical anomaly or might there be reason to believe this PC is unstable and has submitted incorrect factor-found results? |
|
|
|
|
|
#315 |
|
Jun 2003
2×3×7×112 Posts |
yes
i wouldn't call it an anomaly. expected was 2, got 5. no biggie. you'll be balanced out by lot of people with fewer-than-expected results. btw, you can check http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/ to see if the factors have made thru. |
|
|
|
|
|
#316 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
22×3×17×23 Posts |
Quote:
In fact it went one step further and factored one of my factors found as it was not prime itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#317 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
426710 Posts |
The only thing I might be a bit worried about is that it's not always submitting the no-factor-found results, but that seems unlikely considering the timing (a bit over 2 days per result to have 30 in 2010).
I'd call it an anomaly. (as long as no pedantic people want to consider the word as being overly-specific, but a quick dictionary check suggests it'd be good enough) An unlikely event, for sure, but not so impossibly unlikely as to be a sure indicator of a problem. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2010-03-12 at 18:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#318 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
125416 Posts |
Quote:
I know I have had others suggesting P-1 completions in closer to 1 day but I have never been able to acheive that ... am I doing something wrong? As long as there is adequate RAM (at least 2G) I allocate somewhere between 750M-1000M. For exponents in the 50M range I always get an estimated success rate of 6-7%. B1/B2 are typically about 600K / 16M On my bigger dual/quad PCs with 1 core P-1 and the rest DC my P-1 run times are: Code:
Q9550 / E6550 about 50 hours i7-860 about 36 hours i5-750 (OC to 3.2) about 32 hours P.S. I have noted that so far this year I have lost 5 P-1 results during Server Outages (4 on this PC). George knows and will check on his return. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#319 | |
|
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
2·7·132 Posts |
Quote:
William |
|
|
|
|