C443 issue - Page 6

em99010pepe · 2008-12-17, 20:28

New modem is up and running but I can't open port 443 for the llrnet server...

IronBits · 2008-12-17, 22:43

Use a different internal port number and route 443 to the new internal server port...
You all hit my router with 400, it gets routed to 9000 where the server is. ;)

mdettweiler · 2008-12-18, 01:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronBits

Use a different internal port number and route 443 to the new internal server port...
You all hit my router with 400, it gets routed to 9000 where the server is. ;)

Hmm...well, actually I'm thinking that Carlos's problem *doesn't* have to do with the port being problematic on the server machine itself (or else he wouldn't have been able to run a client on port 443 for so long already); instead, that it's already taken on the outside interface fo the *modem*. Many modems/routers/etc. use ports such as 443 for allowing outside access to the router's configuration page.

At least based on what I see on my Linksys router, there's an option under the "Administration" tab for enabling/disabling the remote management setting. Either disable it, or set it to use a different port.

IronBits · 2008-12-18, 03:10

It's true that he is using a well known port...

https 443/tcp http protocol over TLS/SSL
https 443/udp http protocol over TLS/SSL
https 443/sctp HTTPS

Something I avoid as much as possible.

em99010pepe · 2008-12-18, 08:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronBits

It's true that he is using a well known port...

https 443/tcp http protocol over TLS/SSL
https 443/udp http protocol over TLS/SSL
https 443/sctp HTTPS

Something I avoid as much as possible.

You are right. I will change ports, can I make a foward from 443 to another one? I think so but I think it's better to use a new one for the server. Maybe 4000?!

Last night I had the new modem running but then I changed something and the machine couldn't recognize it anymore. I even tried to install the old modem but nothing happened. Today I managed to install the old one so next weekend I will play a little with the new modem.
Sorry for having my home machine shutdown for the night and not helping Drive 1. Now everything is up and running with the old modem...lol

Annoys me very much to easily install an internal ADSL modem but not an external one.

Carlos

gd_barnes · 2008-12-18, 09:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

You are right. I will change ports, can I make a foward from 443 to another one? I think so but I think it's better to use a new one for the server. Maybe 4000?!

Last night I had the new modem running but then I changed something and the machine couldn't recognize it anymore. I even tried to install the old modem but nothing happened. Today I managed to install the old one so next weekend I will play a little with the new modem.
Sorry for having my home machine shutdown for the night and not helping Drive 1. Now everything is up and running with the old modem...lol

Annoys me very much to easily install an internal ADSL modem but not an external one.

Carlos

I think using port 4000 would make it easy to confuse with my currently existing port 4000. Anything except for port 400, 4000, 5000, and 8000 is fine with me. We'll use port 8000 on my machine for the k=1005-2000 for n=350K-500K effort.

Gary

em99010pepe · 2008-12-18, 10:08

I'll use port 7000. C7000.

em99010pepe · 2008-12-19, 18:44

C443 is now C6000 (something wrong with port 7000). Tomorrow it will go down.

em99010pepe · 2008-12-20, 11:18

New modem installed and C443 now running as C6000. I suggest all clients to move from port 443 to 6000. Thanks!

gd_barnes · 2008-12-20, 11:34

OK, I just ran a test on port 6000 and it worked fine so I'll complete the k/n pair that I was assigned. But I'm confused:

Yesterday morning, port 443 handed out n=693410 for k=341 so that is where I showed it's current testing limit in the "Servers for NPLB" thread. Now, port 6000 handed out n=645718 for k=341.

Which is it? Are there a few abandoned k/n pairs for n=640K-650K that need to be cleared out? If so, what is the true leading edge of the server? That is what I reflect in that thread.

If there are just a few abandonded pairs, I can let my slow laptop here plug away for a few hours to clear some of them out if needed so that the server is back to handing out n>690K again.

Thanks,
Gary

em99010pepe · 2008-12-20, 11:40

There are a few candidates left behind when Jokern and Kman1293 moved to IB400. Don't worry, I'll clean those ones.

2008-12-18, 03:10	#59
IronBits I ♥ BOINC! Oct 2002 Glendale, AZ. (USA) 3·7·53 Posts	It's true that he is using a well known port... https 443/tcp http protocol over TLS/SSL https 443/udp http protocol over TLS/SSL https 443/sctp HTTPS Something I avoid as much as possible. Last fiddled with by IronBits on 2008-12-18 at 03:11

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
DC performance issue	cuBerBruce	Information & Answers	2	2017-07-10 13:43
GWNUM issue	ET_	Software	4	2017-06-15 09:52
32/64 bit gmp-ecm issue...	WraithX	GMP-ECM	15	2016-12-19 17:42
Forum Log In issue	Unregistered	Information & Answers	7	2011-09-28 05:14
C443 server issues on 4th drive	Brucifer	No Prime Left Behind	24	2008-09-21 16:33

2008-12-17, 20:28	#56
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts	New modem is up and running but I can't open port 443 for the llrnet server...

2008-12-17, 22:43	#57
IronBits I ♥ BOINC! Oct 2002 Glendale, AZ. (USA) 3·7·53 Posts	Use a different internal port number and route 443 to the new internal server port... You all hit my router with 400, it gets routed to 9000 where the server is. ;)

2008-12-18, 10:08	#62
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts	I'll use port 7000. C7000.

2008-12-19, 18:44	#63
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2·5·283 Posts	C443 is now C6000 (something wrong with port 7000). Tomorrow it will go down.

2008-12-20, 11:18	#64
em99010pepe Sep 2004 101100001110₂ Posts	New modem installed and C443 now running as C6000. I suggest all clients to move from port 443 to 6000. Thanks!

2008-12-20, 11:34	#65
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	OK, I just ran a test on port 6000 and it worked fine so I'll complete the k/n pair that I was assigned. But I'm confused: Yesterday morning, port 443 handed out n=693410 for k=341 so that is where I showed it's current testing limit in the "Servers for NPLB" thread. Now, port 6000 handed out n=645718 for k=341. Which is it? Are there a few abandoned k/n pairs for n=640K-650K that need to be cleared out? If so, what is the true leading edge of the server? That is what I reflect in that thread. If there are just a few abandonded pairs, I can let my slow laptop here plug away for a few hours to clear some of them out if needed so that the server is back to handing out n>690K again. Thanks, Gary

2008-12-20, 11:40	#66
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2·5·283 Posts	There are a few candidates left behind when Jokern and Kman1293 moved to IB400. Don't worry, I'll clean those ones.