![]() |
|
|
#23 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
647410 Posts |
Quote:
that with enough memory you could beat heapsort or quicksort into a cocked hat. Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2008-11-29 at 17:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Jun 2003
5,051 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
Quote:
"complicated method" starts to win. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
10010110011112 Posts |
Quote:
![]() ...on the word length ...on the microcode ...on the compiler optimizations ...on the bus width ...on the memory and network latency As you know, Karatsuba / FFT methods become useful for numbers with more than 60/70 digits. Luigi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
769210 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
But someone who hadn't studied sorting might be asking: what is the meaning of "heapsort" and "quicksort"? (Google is their friend, but not everyone feels like socializing with an online search engine every time they have a question. :-) Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2008-12-01 at 00:35 Reason: Discounting the possibility that the question is about "cocked hat" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
Yes. It was not a point worth labouring, so I didn't
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
1E0C16 Posts |
and ... the connection between heapsort/quicksort and fast multiplication?
(I really am curious.) Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2008-12-02 at 09:26 |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
Sorry, the only connection was algorithms going as nlogn
and possible improvements thereto. (I did warn against labouring the point )David |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Mar 2004
72·11 Posts |
About whether one will actually get done: Yes, I hope so, because if not, it means my computer got destroyed in a horrible way.
Thanks for this thread :) I totally thought that the last time I asked, someone told me the amount of time it would take to finish an assignment was a year!! That totally made sense to me because I was doing 10M LLs in three weeks or so. I just did a timing, and it said 4.5 years if I use both CPUs!! I totally just switched to doing one exponent at a time :) \\EDIT: At least one 100M mersenne has been finished by SOMEONE, right? I tried to find it on primenet but didn't find it. Does anyone have info on this question? Last fiddled with by JuanTutors on 2008-12-21 at 01:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
22×1,549 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 332.2M - 333.9M (aka 100M digit range) | Uncwilly | LMH > 100M | 684 | 2018-07-01 10:52 |
| overclocking an i7-2600 to finish an 100M exponent in less than a year :) | emily | Hardware | 4 | 2013-02-28 20:11 |
| I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... | JuanTutors | PrimeNet | 8 | 2012-12-06 13:47 |
| 100M-digit n/k pairs | __HRB__ | Riesel Prime Search | 0 | 2010-05-22 01:17 |
| 100M digit prime | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 10 | 2010-03-24 20:16 |