PrimeNet 5.0 Upgrade

[Prime95]

Originally Posted by ckdo

which currently has 3000+ assignments.

Non-standard usage may well result in non-standard issues. Is there any particular reason you want to have 3000 active assignments?

[starrynte]

Originally Posted by petrw1

I'm pretty sure it is either stage but I could double check.
I have 2G allocated

Mine is in stage 1 and it takes (corrected) 4 seconds so probably in either stage

[starrynte]

Originally Posted by ckdo

If comment out ... assignments in worktodo.txt

How? (I would like to do so on some of my exponents which are expected to complete in months, to hopefully decrease time needed to calculate completion dates)

[Bundu]

I updated a computer last night at a buddies and for some reason it is now showing twice in my account. I have tried to get it to merge but when I try I get the following message:

CPU 58edf390c255c13cd94b08b7fb35deb6 reported results after CPU 62cbbeddf7068de3fc607680806580aa was created

What can I do?

[Prime95]

Originally Posted by Bundu

I updated a computer last night at a buddies and for some reason it is now showing twice in my account.

What can I do?

First, send me the prime.log file.

[petrw1]

Originally Posted by Bundu

I updated a computer last night at a buddies and for some reason it is now showing twice in my account. I have tried to get it to merge but when I try I get the following message:

CPU 58edf390c255c13cd94b08b7fb35deb6 reported results after CPU 62cbbeddf7068de3fc607680806580aa was created

What can I do?

Same thing happened to me a couple months ago when I reinstalled XP on a machine. George's answer was that somehow in the reinstall process XP give the CPU and new ID. No problem, I just merged the CPUs and the problem is history.

[petrw1]

[QUOTE=petrw1;154815]

 Today's Numbers (That was on Dec 23)
 Teams 121 
 Users 5791 
 CPUs 40240 
 TFLOP/s 38.349 
 GHz-Days 19174.259

Today's Numbers 
 Teams 132 
 Users 7667 
 CPUs 50001 
 TFLOP/s 37.974 
 GHz-Days 18986.851

Interesting 3 weeks later; 10,000 more CPUs but the thruput numbers are slightly lower.

[petrw1]

Originally Posted by petrw1

Interesting 3 weeks later; 10,000 more CPUs but the thruput numbers are slightly lower.

I'll throw out the suggestion that this implies that virtually all the "new" CPUs are actually V4_Computers being converted to V5 and with that the Thruput is simply moving from the V4 bucket to the actual CPUs.

[petrw1]

If I want to move some assignments from one CPU to another is the preferred method to:

A. Put the exponents in Worktodo.Add on the destination CPU and once added successfully delete the lines from source CPU Worktodo.txt (will this second part happen automatically too?)

B. Cut and paste the WorkToDo.txt lines from the source to destination

C. Other?? _________________________

[monst]

Option B is best. Option A will not work because the exponents are already registered with the server, so the 2nd computer cannot re-register them.

-- monst

[petrw1]

Originally Posted by monst

Option B is best. Option A will not work because the exponents are already registered with the server, so the 2nd computer cannot re-register them.

-- monst

Thanks ... and more precisely so as not to upset the server would I:

a. Add the assignments to the destination CPU.
b. Do a manual communication, expecting the server to show them assigned to the destination CPU. Or will they show up as assigned to both until step d?
c. Delete them from the source CPU
d. Do a manual communication.