![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
23×41 Posts |
Good news!
I found this week a Gigantic Probable Prime Triplet ! With huge efforts I found after 176 Gigantic Twins a set of 3 primes. Every prime have 10047 digits. These are 2072644824759 * 2^33333 -1, +1,+5. The problem, certify the 3rd number :-( best wishes Cybertronic Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2008-10-17 at 08:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
23×41 Posts |
Thank you, but I have contact him ... he help me later. I had started PRIMO
v 3.06 but the number is to hard. No jump to TEST 2. The 2nd chance is PRIMO v 2.2.0 beta 4. , perhaps he found a way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
5108 Posts |
PRIMO v. 2204 don't start a downrun sequenz :-(...so I hope I get help from F. Morain .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
23×3×5×72 Posts |
where can u download the old version of primo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2×17×73 Posts |
How many months would a certification take on a fast P4?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
5108 Posts |
I have archived 6 versions , 2.0 , 2.204 , 2.205, 2.207, 301 and 3,06 .
You can't download no previous version. best Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2008-10-19 at 18:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
23×41 Posts |
I don't no. A P4 is slower than AMD Athlon / Phenom CPU.
But it exist a good estimate for running time. Calculate ( (actual bits / total bits )^4.86) and you get the left running time in percent, independently from PC-System. You get 60 months on a P4 3.2 GHz for a 10k number. Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2008-10-19 at 18:57 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.
21378 Posts |
I used version 2.3.2 on a 16390 bit number - I wonder if it would exhibit any improvements over the versions you have listed. pm me if you want to try it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
2·5·239 Posts |
Damn, you're right.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
23·41 Posts |
It possible I have also v 2.3.2, but 3.06 is faster or better for larger numbers.
It's no problem to get the other versions from me. Email me :-) I had veriyfed a 6223 digit number ( the actual triplet record ) in record time with version 3.0. Only 800h I need with 4 simultanious tasks. So it's possible to verify a 16390bit number in a week ! Also you can switched from v 2.3.2 to v.306 , it's easy ! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| probable largest prime. | sudaprime | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2018-02-05 08:10 |
| Fourth probable prime found, one to go! | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 22 | 2010-01-01 00:23 |
| Megadigit probable prime found, our third! | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 25 | 2009-09-09 06:48 |
| Another record probable prime found! | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 15 | 2009-02-08 19:43 |
| Record probable prime found! | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 18 | 2009-01-28 19:47 |