mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-03-01, 16:25   #254
TimSorbet
Account Deleted
 
TimSorbet's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

11×389 Posts
Default

(due to length limitations, instead of having the giant number here, I'm just going to link to its page at the FactorDB, and replace it throughout with 'm')

m is chosen as the odd number such that 2^21954+77899=m*2^n-1.
m=(2^21954+77900)/4
Code:
2^21954+77899=m*2^2-1
This has already been proven prime by conventional means, and is just being used as an example.
Here's what PFGW does with it, with this command: "-qm*2^2-1 -tp"
Code:
PFGW Version 3.3.1.20100111.Win_Dev [GWNUM 25.13]

Primality testing m*2^2-1 [N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge]
Running N+1 test using discriminant 5, base 1+sqrt(5)
Generic modular reduction using generic reduction FFT length 2048 on 2^21954+77899
Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 0.28%
m*2^2-1 is Lucas PRP! (9.3029s+0.0805s)

Done.
Why did it revert to a PRP test instead of being able to do a N+1 primality test? Read this from pfgwdoc.txt: (bold mine for emphasis)
Quote:
A.3. More details/methods used

Pfgw can work with numbers from 2 up to almost 2^79700000 (about 24000000
digits). It can find probable primes with Fermat's method, with bases
from 2 to 256.
To be more precise: The largest FFT is 4 million elements long, with 19
bits per element. GFN's can be tested upto 24M digits, and generic numbers
upto 12M digits.
To prove a number prime, other methods need to be used.
Only a small percentage of all numbers can be easily proven prime.
Name a number N, then you must be able to factor N-1 or N+1 to 33.33% to
find a proof using PFGW.

If N-1 is factored deep enough, then Pocklington's test can be applied.
If N+1 is factored deep enough, then Morrison's test can be applied.
If N^2-1 is factored deep enough, a combined method can be used.

A.3.1 Fermat's method
Fermat's method is NOT a proof, but more like a quick indicator that a
number might be prime.

A.3.2 Pocklington's test
This test can be used whenever N-1 can be factored to 33.33% of the size
of N. (Actually, the factored part must be greater than the cube root of
N/1000000). This test is conclusive.

A.3.3 Morrison's test
This test can be used whenever N+1 can be factored to 33.33% of the size
of N.
(Actually, the factored part must be greater than the cube root of
N/1000000). This test is conclusive.

A.3.4 F-Strong test
This test is used when you use the -t option, and your factors don't reach
the magic 33.33%. It is a strong-primality test, and gives more certainty
than a Fermat test, but still is NOT a proof!
So unless N+1 can be factored to 33.33% of the size of N, you can't do the conclusive N+1 test. (and same thing with N-1) It is, of course, possible to turn any number into k*b^n-1, and (I think) possible to use an N+1 test on any number, but unless the k is smaller than b^n, you probably won't meet that magic 33.33% size limit without factoring N+1.
So you can trade a difficult primality test for an easy one in addition to a difficult factoring. It is MUCH easier to do a primality test on a number with thousands of digits than to try to factor a number with thousands of digits. With current hardware and methods, and without extraordinary luck, it's basically impossible to factor m.

Last fiddled with by TimSorbet on 2010-03-01 at 16:32
TimSorbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-02, 03:31   #255
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.

32·7·163 Posts
Default

Kenneth-

In addition to what Tim wrote, I can add that for some special forms we can use the "helper" primes. One of the larger examples that I found last summer was a 9016-digit PRP
N = (52*10^9015-43)/9 = 57777...77773 (many sevens in the middle).

Why is that? That's because N-1 factors to slightly more than 33.33%.
The rich collection of repunits is studied fairly well, and it turns out that
N-1 = (52*10^9015-43)/9 -1 =
= (52*10^9015-52)/9 =
= 2^2*13*(10^9015-1)/9 =
= 2^2*13*(10^3005-1)/9 * c6011
But (10^3005-1)/9 happens to be fully factored (which is lucky! because this is 33.33% of the N-1).

After proving primality of the 2379-digit cofactor with Primo, I provided these and a few small prime factors from the 6011-digit cofactor in a helper file, and voila - a proof by PFGW with 33.62% factored part. All less than in a day (including Primo).

Primality testing (52*10^9015-43)/9 [N-1/N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge]
Reading factors from helper file ../h9015
Running N-1 test using base 2
Running N+1 test using discriminant 5, base 5+sqrt(5)
Calling N-1 BLS with factored part 33.62% and helper 0.05% (100.92% proof)
(52*10^9015-43)/9 is prime! (27.5956s+0.0014s)


There are much more elegant examples (see openpfgw yahoo group), but this is one is very simple to tell in one paragraph. (not bragging; this is not a very large number)

See PFGW's manual about the helper file.

-Serge
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-05, 00:56   #256
philmoore
 
philmoore's Avatar
 
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.

19·59 Posts
Default

A followup on the notice from Wilfrid Keller:

He has now confirmed that all primes (or prps) up to 261792+21661 are indeed the smallest in their respective sequences, and has tested the remaining sequences out to n = 42000. I have independently confirmed all of his findings, and continued up to 2551542+19249. This leaves only the six largest probable primes not confirmed to be the smallest in their sequences, so I will slowly continue this project. We did find one more error on Payam Samidoost's webpage, the prime 21622+32449 was apparently missed, as the prime listed for that sequence was 21814+32449. Given that 21885+29777 was also missed, but later discovered, I suspect some errors in early versions of pfgw. Mark assures me that error checking is much more robust in the current version. Samidoost's webpage has disappeared, but I replaced the link with the cached version of Neil Sloane's:
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/se.../a076336c.html

I intend to prepare a file of Sloane sequence A067760 as far as (78557-1)/2soon and upload it to the Forum.
philmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-15, 18:16   #257
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

3·239 Posts
Default

Status:
Phase 1:TEST 200 (9879 digits left, 70 days to go)
Phase 2:TEST 1-159 done.

Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-03-15 at 18:38
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-03-29, 04:03   #258
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

13158 Posts
Default

Status:
Phase 1:TEST 250 (9365 digits left, 60 days to go)
Phase 2:TEST 1-209 done.
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-04, 08:59   #259
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

3×239 Posts
Default

Happy easter !

Now I'm below 30000 bits ! 60% done.
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-07, 20:21   #260
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

10110011012 Posts
Default

Status:
Phase 1 TEST 300, 8895 digits left, 46 days left
Phase 2 252 TESTs done

Next report at TEST 400 in 14 days
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-20, 10:35   #261
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

71710 Posts
Default

Status:
Phase 1 TEST 400, 8032 digits left, 32 days left
Phase 2 345 TESTs done

Next report at TEST 600 at May, 7th

Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-04-20 at 10:36
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-07, 17:56   #262
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

3·239 Posts
Default

So people , new status.. not 600, but 566

Phase 1 at TEST 566 (6699 digits left)
Phase 2 TESTs 1-499 done.

May, 25th was calculated ... then the certificate is available.

Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-05-07 at 17:57
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-19, 20:46   #263
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

71710 Posts
Default

Status:
Phase 1 at TEST 800, 4916 digits left
Phase 2 1-720 done
Signing points 1-684 complete
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-22, 20:02   #264
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

3·239 Posts
Default

In PRIMO , I like this number !
http://www.sendspace.com/file/1un0wn
Cybertronic is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2^9092392+40291 is a probable prime! engracio Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem 91 2023-03-06 21:22
generalized minimal (probable) primes sweety439 sweety439 140 2022-12-20 07:08
probable largest prime. sudaprime Miscellaneous Math 11 2018-02-05 08:10
Hi, how can I test my probable prime number? mohdosa Information & Answers 22 2014-10-10 11:34
Record probable prime found! philmoore Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem 18 2009-01-28 19:47

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:41.


Fri Jul 7 15:41:41 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 13:10, 0 users, load averages: 1.59, 1.33, 1.18

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔