![]() |
|
|
#188 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
2×3×5×11 Posts |
Good news, I will extended my PRIMO record and I take the number "2^38090+47269"
![]() Now I'm on TEST 4 , 38029/38091. |
|
|
|
|
|
#189 | |
|
May 2007
112 Posts |
Quote:
I got stuck on a few test and just broke out of it to test 260. I ran into test 257 and almost completed all 5 runs and ending up backtracking to test 256 twice. Each time it backtracked and found the next test it was a different bit. Finally found the good test and moved thru test 258.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
2×3×5×11 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#191 |
|
May 2007
112 Posts |
Norman I am moving along and on Test 303/19010bit. My phase 2 test is on test 22 also moving along.
I think I got the Phase 1 rhythm of saving the new test/*.tmp to backup, over writing the old *.tmp with the new test *.tmp and running run 1..5. Luckily I have not done any Run 6/delta. Run 1..5 have always managed to jump to the next test or I was able to go back to a previous test and move up to the next test from there. Now it is just waiting for the 950 odd phase 1 test to complete.Question on phase 2, my current *.tmp running phase 1 is only up to test 229. As I stated I am now on test 303. What is the best way to multi task phase 2 if I have another core?? Should I copy/append test 230 to the end of test 229 or on a different folder with a different core start phase 2 on test 230??? Which is better, delete test 1..229 or take out Type=-4 up to test 229and run pe=2/phase 2? I know you said we need to copy all of the completed/ready test to a pre-certificate file prior to merging all files and running the certification. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#192 | |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
33010 Posts |
Quote:
Create for each core a new directory, like Phase2_1,Phase2_2 ... Put in all PRIMO files include the tmp-file you will split. To begin , save all done Phase2 TEST [1..22] in a "master"-file. Example: a second core will also calculate Phase 2. - Copy the tmp-file,like the TMP-file with TEST [1..228] to \Phase2_2 - Kill the "-" of each Type=-? [1..4] for TEST [1] to TEST[100], set pe=2 - start PRIMO, Primo did start Phase 2 at TEST 101 - When you calculate TEST 230 , 231,... then kill the "-" FOR TEST 1 to TEST 229 , set pe=2 and compare the S$ of TEST 229 old file with the new tmp-file. Is it equal , so okay . Is not, so was on TEST 229 a backtrack and look then TEST 228, 227 and so on. Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2009-12-20 at 14:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#193 | ||
|
May 2007
112 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
2·3·5·11 Posts |
BTW , I'm now at TEST 16..37802/38091.
When you work correct, you should be done with Phase 1 at 31th december 09
|
|
|
|
|
|
#195 | |
|
May 2007
112 Posts |
Quote:
test 304/19006bit as we speak. Might be a few days later since When I am not by the computer I prp for FOB on this computer.
Last fiddled with by engracio on 2009-12-20 at 15:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#196 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
2×3×5×11 Posts |
I wonder, only TEST 22 of Phase 2.
What is the CPU- type of your multicore PC ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#197 | |
|
May 2007
112 Posts |
Quote:
My plan Norman is when this *.tmp completes Phase 2 test 50, I will stop it. Save the *.tmp file to the Pre-certificate folder. This *.tmp was with the test completed up to test 229. Copy the newest *.tmp which is done up to test 303 and break it down to 50 test each and run 2 cores each on the Intel P4 and AMD X2. Hopefully I will catch up enough to Phase 1 test so that I can merge it as soon as possible. There should be no problem as long as I am using the same *.tmp files correct?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#198 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
14A16 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| generalized minimal (probable) primes | sweety439 | sweety439 | 133 | 2021-08-06 03:43 |
| 2^9092392+40291 is a probable prime! | engracio | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 90 | 2020-10-21 15:37 |
| probable largest prime. | sudaprime | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2018-02-05 08:10 |
| Hi, how can I test my probable prime number? | mohdosa | Information & Answers | 22 | 2014-10-10 11:34 |
| Record probable prime found! | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 18 | 2009-01-28 19:47 |