mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-10-06, 16:44   #12
nuggetprime
 
nuggetprime's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Austria

2·151 Posts
Default

Just for information, my Q6600(no overclock) runs at ~70 °C with the standard Intel fan and 4 llr instances running.
Code:
hugo@hugo-desktop:~$ sensors
it8718-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
in0:         +1.23 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in1:         +1.81 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in2:         +3.25 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in3:         +2.94 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in4:         +1.63 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in5:         +0.00 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in6:         +0.08 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in7:         +3.06 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
in8:         +3.10 V
fan1:       1934 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
fan2:          0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
fan3:       2070 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
fan4:       2083 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
temp1:       +33.0°C  (low  = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)  sensor = transistor
temp2:       +58.0°C  (low  = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)  sensor = thermal diode
temp3:        -2.0°C  (low  = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)  sensor = transistor
cpu0_vid:   +0.000 V

coretemp-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 0:      +72.0°C  (crit = +100.0°C)                  

coretemp-isa-0001
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 1:      +67.0°C  (crit = +100.0°C)                  

coretemp-isa-0002
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 2:      +67.0°C  (crit = +100.0°C)                  

coretemp-isa-0003
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 3:      +72.0°C  (crit = +100.0°C)
nuggetprime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-03, 23:26   #13
lfm
 
lfm's Avatar
 
Jul 2006
Calgary

6518 Posts
Default ogr?

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronBits View Post
Get rid of the stock HSF. I use Thermaltake Big Typhoons.
Mine runs at 30C or 86F with DNET OGR cranking away for weeks and months.
No case of course. Room temp is kept between 76F and 80F.
I don't think OGR cranking would heat up a cpu much in any case since it doesn't use any floating point to start with.
lfm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-07, 19:45   #14
Freightyard
 
Nov 2008
San Luis Obispo CA

27 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADBjester View Post
The Zalman CNPS 9700 is the current "nuts" (in my opinion) for air coolers. Find it at frozencpu.com.

I find that closed cases make for errors and higher temps. I tend to run "open" cases as well, with an external fan blowing good cool air into the case.
I read a review that put the Noctua ahead of all the rest for heat dissipation and noise level. And, they make a version for the Nehelem!

I'd have to politely disagree about running an open case. Properly engineered airflows (might not get this on just any case) are important. When running 100% 24/7 one should consider front and rear fans, check cable placement and other items that obstruct air flow, etc. I've even manufactured baffles at times to direct or block air flow.

I would tend to blame case or motherboard design before saying an open case is the solution. But if you've found what works for you, and you seem to be aware of the issues, by all means... Intel sometimes lists cases that are "certified" for a particular platform, which I think includes airflow. My Intel manufactured server chassis has very detailed airflow design.
Freightyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-07, 20:03   #15
Jeff Gilchrist
 
Jeff Gilchrist's Avatar
 
Jun 2003
Ottawa, Canada

3×17×23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freightyard View Post
I read a review that put the Noctua ahead of all the rest for heat dissipation and noise level. And, they make a version for the Nehelem!
I'm very happy with my Noctua, and it is very quiet.

Jeff.
Jeff Gilchrist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-09, 04:11   #16
db597
 
db597's Avatar
 
Jan 2003

110010112 Posts
Default

I've got both the Zalman CNPS9700 and the ZeroTherm FS120 - running 2 PCs. Started off with the Zalman with an earlier build. Works great, happy bunny.

But when I came to build my next PC, I just couldn't get my head around the price. It's more than double of the ZeroTherm, so I went for the latter. On my overclocked Q6600, the ZeroTherm matches the Zalman in performance - maybe even slightly cooler. A bargin considering it's so much cheaper.

On the flip side, the fan on the ZeroTherm isn't the best. I'll replace it one day with a Panaflo (my favourite make for fans). The Zalman's fan I think is better, but can't upgrade since it's non-replacable.

I also found the Zalman's clip mechanism to be more fiddly than the ZeroTherms. The cooler can rotate a little and the clasp wasn't easy to get in place due to it being springy. ZeroTherm's was far easier - just tighten the screws in the four corners.

Weighing the factors, unless Zalman halves their prices, on my next build I'd go for the ZeroTherm again.
db597 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-09, 13:18   #17
stars10250
 
stars10250's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
San Francisco, CA

3118 Posts
Default

I use a Zerothem FZ-120 on my OC'd Q6600 (3.2 GHz) and my four cores run in the low 40's Celsius at full load. I also use one on my dual core E8500. My only complaint is that it is slightly too large. In one application it interferes with closing the case because it is too tall (so now I just leave it open) and in the other it hangs over one of my memory slots (so I use the other pair of memory slots, as I just have two sticks). This would be really bad if I wanted to close my computer case or run four sticks of memory, which shouldn't be asking too much of computer hardware these days. I consider that a bad design, but it cools so well and is so inexpensive that I like it nonetheless. It works for my applications. Right now newegg sells it for $44 with a $30 rebate, so it costs just $14. That's pretty hard to beat.
stars10250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-30, 23:22   #18
joblack
 
joblack's Avatar
 
Oct 2008
n00bville

23×7×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcduck View Post
Hello

I'm thinking there might be a problem with the cooling on my box.
When running 4 instances of llr.exe i'm running a temperature of 78-80C.
This is on a stock Q6600 (Quad-Core 2.4ghz) running at factory settings (no overclock).

Anybody else running llr on Q6600 who might shed some light as to wether this is normal or not?

Any help is much appreciated!
Have you removed this transparent plastic sticker on the cooler or/and cpu?
joblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-31, 01:02   #19
Phantomas
 
Phantomas's Avatar
 
Oct 2008
Germany, Hamburg

5×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcduck View Post
Hello

I'm thinking there might be a problem with the cooling on my box.
When running 4 instances of llr.exe i'm running a temperature of 78-80C.
This is on a stock Q6600 (Quad-Core 2.4ghz) running at factory settings (no overclock).
It also depends on the tool which is reading out the temps. Because the temps can't be readout direct, but are given as a distance to the T-Junction temperature (the one at which the processor begins to throttle).

Poorly the T-Junction of each processor isn't announced by Intel, and varies from 80°C to 115°C (as far as i know), so the Tools must guess it.

So, you must either know what T-Junction value your tool uses, or you use a tool which gives out the difference to T-Junction. This way you know, how far away from throttling (and so from save usage) your processor is working.

I'm using Realtemp, please look at http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads...Temp_2.70.html

A Value of 30°C to 20°C should be fine in most cases.
Phantomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-03, 15:40   #20
stars10250
 
stars10250's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
San Francisco, CA

20110 Posts
Default hot mosfets

I was measuring temperatures on my motherboard (with a hand-held IR meter) and noticed that the power mosfets around my OC'd Q6600 cpu were hot....~190 degrees F. Maybe this is normal for them, but it concerned me. I'm a few days away from building this system into a case, and for now it is free-standing. I had a cpu HS/fan, one fan on the NB and one on the SB, but nothing for the mosfets. I added a large fourth fan for them and got their temperature down to ~120 degrees F, which feels safer. I'm surprised more people don't talk about cooling these parts. I do see some motherboards have mosfet heatsinks and even active cooling for them, but not all. For fun, I wanted to see if my new cooling would allow for a bigger OC and it did. I raised the system to 1700 MHz FSB (from 1600), 3.4 GHz (from 3.2), and it ran stable for an hour. Previously it would crash in about 4 minutes at these settings. I'm not personally comfortable with these numbers, so I put it back to where I've been running stable for a month now. But I just wanted to mention this might be something people overlook with regard to temperature, OC, and system stability. Case enclosure will probably help get some air moving over them, but I'm still going to add a dedicated fan blowing on the mosfets when I build my case next week.

Last fiddled with by stars10250 on 2009-01-03 at 15:41
stars10250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-26, 10:11   #21
CADavis
 
CADavis's Avatar
 
Jul 2005
Des Moines, Iowa, USA

2·5·17 Posts
Default

I have been running Prime95 on my Dell Studio 15 laptop that has a Core 2 Duo, and with both cores running the temperatures were 75-80 C (very high for a desktop CPU but I thought it wasn't horribly uncommon for a laptop). I switched the stock thermal paste with Arctic Ceramique and the temperatures dropped to 59-64 C!:surprised Which is a tremendous difference IMO

Just thought I'd share my experience as well as chime in that correctly applied, decent thermal paste can make a noticeable difference in some situations.

Edit: Forgot to mention that the temperature monitoring software that I use is Core Temp 0.99.4

Last fiddled with by CADavis on 2009-01-26 at 10:12
CADavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should i go with i7 920 or Q6600? cipher No Prime Left Behind 15 2009-04-29 01:34
Q6600 little OC nuggetprime No Prime Left Behind 14 2008-12-29 12:14
Slow overclocking Q6600 henryzz Hardware 19 2008-11-02 07:32
q6600 = run 4 instances of prime95? bazza Information & Answers 2 2007-09-20 23:23
cpu temperature 80 C_>>is it normal? gh_tino Hardware 8 2007-04-04 05:30

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:01.


Mon Aug 2 14:01:08 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 8:30, 0 users, load averages: 3.92, 3.51, 2.78

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.