mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Msieve

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-12-29, 17:57   #45
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23·3·5·72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
They are algebraic factors: the p20 is from 5^29+4^29, the 23 * 256147 are from 5^11+4^11 and the 3^2 is from 5^1+4^1.
thanks
i presume that why they arent in the tables
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-29, 19:30   #46
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2×17×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
BTW Andi47 read posts 17,18 and 20 of this thread
Sorry - I thought "just call me Henry" below your avatar really meant that...


Quote:
edit: when i came to calculate the number there were lots of addtional factors that werent mentioned here including a p20 that i had to find myself
When you click the reservation link, you will see the remaining cofactor - so you will not have to split small factors off...

BTW: Which kind of computer do you use for this factorization? For a Core 2 Duo (2 GHz, using both threads) I would estimate ~2 weeks. Parameters (rlim, alim, lpbr, and such...) can be found over there in the alq4788-thread. For the lambdas it seems to be near the crossover between 2.5 and 2.6 - maybe you want to do some test sieving.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-29, 20:10   #47
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

588010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
Sorry - I thought "just call me Henry" below your avatar really meant that...
surely u have been around the forum long enough to know that the only way to get comments below ur name is for xyzzy to add them as a joke
its ok i expect this will happen a lot
i am just hoping if i spread the word people will read that before posting


Quote:
When you click the reservation link, you will see the remaining cofactor - so you will not have to split small factors off...

BTW: Which kind of computer do you use for this factorization? For a Core 2 Duo (2 GHz, using both threads) I would estimate ~2 weeks. Parameters (rlim, alim, lpbr, and such...) can be found over there in the alq4788-thread. For the lambdas it seems to be near the crossover between 2.5 and 2.6 - maybe you want to do some test sieving.
a Q6600 which is currently at stock
my pc doesnt run 24/7 which limits my size quite a bit so does a limit of 2Gb of memory
also i am impatient
thats exactly what i was thinking
pinch the parameters from the aliquot forum
so far i only have the one poly from msieve a 2.387e-011 which is over 2/3 of the one for the latest 4788 factorization
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-29, 20:47   #48
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
surely u have been around the forum long enough to know that the only way to get comments below ur name is for xyzzy to add them as a joke
its ok i expect this will happen a lot
i am just hoping if i spread the word people will read that before posting



a Q6600 which is currently at stock
my pc doesnt run 24/7 which limits my size quite a bit so does a limit of 2Gb of memory
also i am impatient
thats exactly what i was thinking
pinch the parameters from the aliquot forum
so far i only have the one poly from msieve a 2.387e-011 which is over 2/3 of the one for the latest 4788 factorization
Q6600 (quad-core) @2.4 GHz? If you run it ~10 hours/day it should be equally fast as a C2D (=dual core) @2.0 GHz running 24/7, so ~2 weeks should still apply.

BTW: With 2 GB RAM it should be possible to GNFS anything up to ~c155 (maybe even c260) when using a linux environment. With Windows I won't do anything above c150.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-29, 20:52   #49
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2·33·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
surely u have been around the forum long enough to know that the only way to get comments below ur name is for xyzzy to add them as a joke
its ok i expect this will happen a lot
i am just hoping if i spread the word people will read that before posting
Xyzzy can be nasty... look at what happened to flouran. It might have been a joke, but it was still nasty. Somehow I have escaped without a subdescription - and I would like to keep it that way.

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-12-29 at 20:52
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-29, 21:25   #50
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23×3×5×72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
Q6600 (quad-core) @2.4 GHz? If you run it ~10 hours/day it should be equally fast as a C2D (=dual core) @2.0 GHz running 24/7, so ~2 weeks should still apply.

BTW: With 2 GB RAM it should be possible to GNFS anything up to ~c155 (maybe even c260) when using a linux environment. With Windows I won't do anything above c150.
i supose i can run it 12 hours a day for the next week and a half so yes i should hopefully finish in 2 weeks and after that i will only be down to 4-5 if not
i am not hugely patient with the long jobs though so i will probably do some other jobs in the middle of the factorization but i should still finish in 2 weeks as i might recruit another pc to do a few hours work
something that will significantly affect my patience is having to do it in linux away from the things i usually do

edit: mods would a threadsplit be worthwhile? split the posts about my factorization into thier own thread and maybe all the posts about the "Just call me Henry" thing into another(maybe including the posts i quoted to start that off here)

Last fiddled with by henryzz on 2009-12-29 at 21:28
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-29, 22:38   #51
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

10,753 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
Xyzzy can be nasty... look at what happened to flouran. It might have been a joke, but it was still nasty.
Believe me, it could get a lot worse.

Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-12, 17:50   #52
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23×3×5×72 Posts
Default

i have reached the linear algebra stage with 5^319+4^319
it should take about 6 and a half hours for the 2M^2 which means i should get the results tomorrow evening
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-13, 19:16   #53
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

133708 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
i have reached the linear algebra stage with 5^319+4^319
it should take about 6 and a half hours for the 2M^2 which means i should get the results tomorrow evening
prp55 factor: 6852013642934374356846035958993519237208519773511625423
prp83 factor: 12968222269216341341220108397357041906689524861847658294907716830211054521792631607
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-13, 19:39   #54
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

36×13 Posts
Default

I suggest splitting posts from #40 into a separate thread.
There's no degree 7-8 data in them.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-13, 19:45   #55
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

16F816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
I suggest splitting posts from #40 into a separate thread.
There's no degree 7-8 data in them.
i suggested this at the bottom of #50 as well
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
QS Lattice Siever R.D. Silverman Factoring 31 2018-10-08 17:17
Compiling 64 bit lattice siever on gcc 4.8.5 chris2be8 Factoring 6 2018-02-06 17:22
OpenCL accellerated lattice siever pstach Factoring 1 2014-05-23 01:03
Shape of a CUDA lattice siever fivemack Programming 2 2012-12-16 01:07
ggnfs lattice siever misses some primes fivemack Factoring 1 2008-01-18 13:47

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:55.


Sat Jul 17 00:55:53 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 22:43, 1 user, load averages: 1.23, 1.33, 1.35

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.