![]() |
|
|
#496 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
26×151 Posts |
That is what I said in post #481. We got someone with power on his hand, let him take the expos he likes. Most of the guys with reservations there, we will never see them again. And Uncwilly, you don't need to feel guilty about anything, we all know the lots of effort you put into this range, from the very beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#497 |
|
Jan 2015
11·23 Posts |
I found out something interesting. I gave each of these cores a 100M job. It seems like they're only being assigned TF work, which is fine. That's what I wanted. (Even if it was supposed to take an exponent to a deeper bit level, instead of just doing one bit and moving on)
![]() usslcburnin44 10 111,009,599 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-04-30 -2 usslcburnin44 10 111,009,641 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-04-30 -2 usslcburnin44 10 111,009,733 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-01 -1 usslcburnin44 10 111,009,751 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-01 -1 usslcburnin44 10 111,009,887 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-02 -1 On the other blades I have running the 332M range, it'll keep the TF, P-1, and LL assignment on the same worker thread, maybe since those have AVX and 11 threads to work with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#498 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×23×107 Posts |
I was stating what I did because I have changed my strategy. Instead of hitting only the unassigned, I am going after the lowest exponents. And if Cheesehead ever comes back to us, I wanted to point out that there was no motion going on by the others.
Currently I have a dual core laptop running 72->73. A quad core taking 73->74. 2 of 4 cores on another box going from 74->75, the other 2 working on the first 6 of 77->78 (once they are done they will go to 74->75). And another quad core taking 75->76. |
|
|
|
|
|
#499 |
|
Jan 2015
111111012 Posts |
Looks like my first results will come 28 days later, apparently with zombies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#500 |
|
Jan 2015
3758 Posts |
I got all the blades off of TF work and onto LL... thanks for the help guys. I think I'll put the RAMBeasts back onto P-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#501 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×23×107 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#502 |
|
Jan 2015
11·23 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#503 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
984410 Posts |
Here is the status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999 (plus other data out to 332999999):
Code:
Date of data 2015/05/20 Average bit depth for first 100 expos 78.93 Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 77.92 Average bit depth for first 5000 expos 75.86 Average bit depth for first 10000 expos 74.60 100th active expo (no factor found) 332198423 1000th active expo (no factor found) 332246639 5000th active expo (no factor found) 332446859 10000th active expo (no factor found) 332690087 Unitless total effort number 329,973,760 Number of first 100 expos to 2^78 100 Number of first 100 expos to 2^79 80 Number of first 1000 expos to 2^78 583 Number of first 5000 expos to 2^77 1393 Number of first 10000 expos to 2^76 2934 Number left in range 4072 Estimated expos in range to be removed 150 (by taking all expos to 2^79) Estimated expos in range to be removed 293 (by taking all expos to 2^82) Code:
Bit # at bit level 73 352 74 278 75 897 76 1202 77 519 78 101 79 676 80 33 81 13 82 0 83 0 84 0 85 1 P-1 408 80 - 332192831 79 - 332192969 78 - 332200711 77 - 332205547 76 - 332269319 75 - 332322643 74 - 332366347 73 - 332791241 Left graphic is the count of exponents remaining from 332192831 to 332999999 by bit level. The right one is the actual bit levels of the first ~4200 exponents. The arrows indicate the status at the time of the last update. |
|
|
|
|
|
#504 |
|
Jan 2015
3758 Posts |
Just FYI that big wave of blades I thought would be here by now should be coming in soon...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#505 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
231648 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#506 |
|
Jan 2015
11×23 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPU72 / MISFIT use for 100M digit range? | Uncwilly | GPU to 72 | 64 | 2013-03-31 02:45 |
| I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... | JuanTutors | PrimeNet | 8 | 2012-12-06 13:47 |
| How far along are you in your 100M digit LL test? | JuanTutors | Lounge | 6 | 2012-02-21 07:36 |
| 100M-digit n/k pairs | __HRB__ | Riesel Prime Search | 0 | 2010-05-22 01:17 |
| 100M digit prime | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 10 | 2010-03-24 20:16 |