mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters > LMH > 100M

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2015-05-02, 10:57   #496
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

26×151 Posts
Default

That is what I said in post #481. We got someone with power on his hand, let him take the expos he likes. Most of the guys with reservations there, we will never see them again. And Uncwilly, you don't need to feel guilty about anything, we all know the lots of effort you put into this range, from the very beginning.
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-02, 13:44   #497
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11·23 Posts
Default

I found out something interesting. I gave each of these cores a 100M job. It seems like they're only being assigned TF work, which is fine. That's what I wanted. (Even if it was supposed to take an exponent to a deeper bit level, instead of just doing one bit and moving on)

usslcburnin44 10 111,009,599 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-04-30 -2
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,641 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-04-30 -2
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,733 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-01 -1
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,751 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-01 -1
usslcburnin44 10 111,009,887 TF 4 2015-04-28 2015-04-28 2015-04-29 2015-05-02 -1

On the other blades I have running the 332M range, it'll keep the TF, P-1, and LL assignment on the same worker thread, maybe since those have AVX and 11 threads to work with.
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-02, 13:48   #498
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22×23×107 Posts
Default

I was stating what I did because I have changed my strategy. Instead of hitting only the unassigned, I am going after the lowest exponents. And if Cheesehead ever comes back to us, I wanted to point out that there was no motion going on by the others.

Currently I have a dual core laptop running 72->73. A quad core taking 73->74. 2 of 4 cores on another box going from 74->75, the other 2 working on the first 6 of 77->78 (once they are done they will go to 74->75). And another quad core taking 75->76.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-11, 16:41   #499
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

111111012 Posts
Default

Looks like my first results will come 28 days later, apparently with zombies.
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-18, 19:49   #500
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

3758 Posts
Default

I got all the blades off of TF work and onto LL... thanks for the help guys. I think I'll put the RAMBeasts back onto P-1
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-18, 22:31   #501
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22×23×107 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aurashift View Post
I got all the blades off of TF work and onto LL... thanks for the help guys. I think I'll put the RAMBeasts back onto P-1
I noticed that you got a nice P-1 factor in the 91 or 92 bit range. :)
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-19, 00:25   #502
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11·23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
I noticed that you got a nice P-1 factor in the 91 or 92 bit range. :)
That wasn't on a RAMBeast. That's why I was getting a little irked, that was 8,10, or 12 cores that had a bunch of wasted time.....22 days. Just looked it up.
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-21, 04:05   #503
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

984410 Posts
Default

Here is the status report for the range from 332192831 to 332399999 (plus other data out to 332999999):

Code:
Date of data				2015/05/20
Average bit depth for first 100 expos	78.93
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos	77.92
Average bit depth for first 5000 expos	75.86
Average bit depth for first 10000 expos	74.60
100th active expo (no factor found)	332198423
1000th active expo (no factor found)	332246639
5000th active expo (no factor found)	332446859
10000th active expo (no factor found)	332690087
Unitless total effort number		329,973,760
Number of first 100 expos to 2^78	100
Number of first 100 expos to 2^79	80
Number of first 1000 expos to 2^78	583
Number of first 5000 expos to 2^77	1393
Number of first 10000 expos to 2^76	2934
Number left in range			4072

Estimated expos in range to be removed	150
(by taking all expos to 2^79)
Estimated expos in range to be removed	293
(by taking all expos to 2^82)
Code:
Bit	# at bit level
73	352
74	278
75	897
76	1202
77	519
78	101
79	676
80	33
81	13
82	0
83	0
84	0
85	1
P-1     408
For the following bit levels, these are the 'hold-up' numbers (they are the lowest exponent that is factored to less than the indicated bit level.
80 - 332192831
79 - 332192969
78 - 332200711
77 - 332205547
76 - 332269319
75 - 332322643
74 - 332366347
73 - 332791241

Left graphic is the count of exponents remaining from 332192831 to 332999999 by bit level.
The right one is the actual bit levels of the first ~4200 exponents. The arrows indicate the status at the time of the last update.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100mdstatus-150520a.png
Views:	114
Size:	31.2 KB
ID:	12635   Click image for larger version

Name:	100mdstatus-150520b.png
Views:	112
Size:	28.4 KB
ID:	12636  
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-05-31, 16:18   #504
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

3758 Posts
Default

Just FYI that big wave of blades I thought would be here by now should be coming in soon...
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-01, 01:31   #505
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

231648 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aurashift View Post
Just FYI that big wave of blades I thought would be here by now should be coming in soon...
I'll hold my breath until then.

Not really. I do appreciate all of the work that you have done in this range.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-06-02, 00:38   #506
aurashift
 
Jan 2015

11×23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
I do appreciate all of the work that you have done in this range.
You're very welcome, although I'm getting it by default since it's adequately TF'd, which is very nice.
aurashift is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU72 / MISFIT use for 100M digit range? Uncwilly GPU to 72 64 2013-03-31 02:45
I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... JuanTutors PrimeNet 8 2012-12-06 13:47
How far along are you in your 100M digit LL test? JuanTutors Lounge 6 2012-02-21 07:36
100M-digit n/k pairs __HRB__ Riesel Prime Search 0 2010-05-22 01:17
100M digit prime Unregistered Information & Answers 10 2010-03-24 20:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:30.


Fri Aug 6 23:30:17 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 17:59, 1 user, load averages: 4.14, 3.92, 3.97

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.