![]() |
|
|
#144 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
976710 Posts |
Quote:
Each column is the total number of exponents which have not yet been factored (or at least, that will be the case shortly -- there are a few which have been factored which my database doesn't know about; these generally appear as low factor levels). Within each column, each colour represents the total number of exponents which have been trial factored to that depth. So, for example, on the 332M to 333M graph, the column for 332.5 (to 332.6) shows maybe 40 which have been trial factored to 2^64 (in fact these are where a factor was found), approximately 800 trial factored to 2^65, and the rest trial factored to 2^66. I'm working on a simple web interface, so people will be able to view any range they want. I'll let everyone know when it's online. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#145 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3×5×61 Posts |
Excellent, that would be most helpful.
![]() I think I have decided to assist this project once my current batch of LLs finish on my laptop. I assume the time required to trial factor to 2^66 or so is trivial on a 2.0Ghz 32bit processor? Last fiddled with by Primeinator on 2009-07-20 at 15:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
#146 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3·5·61 Posts |
I would like to go ahead and reserve fifty or so exponents that are below 62 bits. Could someone point to where I can find available exponents to pick through? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#147 | |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2×5×7×67 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 | |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3×5×61 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·4,909 Posts |
Quote:
It's a sticky. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#150 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
Well, it's not "painted" yet (read: no pretty CSS), and the navigation isn't yet as easy as I plan (read: no clickmaps), but the web interface is now online. Please see http://www.wabbit.com/trialfactored.cgi and let me know if you have any comments. If anyone can suggest a better pallet for the colors, that would be great (I'm *so* not a graphic artist). I'm attaching an example of a rendering of the entire range currently in Primenet. Note that I've moved away from the "3D Bars", as while they look cool, they actually make it harder to determine values. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#151 | |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
http://www.mersenne.org/report_expon...&B1=Get+status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 | |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
769210 Posts |
Quote:
Now, on behalf of those of us who are color-vision-impaired, could you add varied cross-hatching or something to help us see the differences between the bit-levels denoted by colors we confuse? For instance, to me the colors for levels 65, 67 and 71 are practically identical (maybe they really are!). Here are two web sites that might help: http://webstandards.psu.edu/accessib...lor/colorblind http://webdesign.about.com/od/access...a/aa062804.htm Let me add that this wouldn't be essential for distinguishing the bars on the graph, just a nice feature (and that's why I've put this in small font). From the alternations of colors I can distinguish, tracing back to the bit-level color legend takes only a second or two. Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2009-07-22 at 17:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#154 |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPU72 / MISFIT use for 100M digit range? | Uncwilly | GPU to 72 | 64 | 2013-03-31 02:45 |
| I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... | JuanTutors | PrimeNet | 8 | 2012-12-06 13:47 |
| How far along are you in your 100M digit LL test? | JuanTutors | Lounge | 6 | 2012-02-21 07:36 |
| 100M-digit n/k pairs | __HRB__ | Riesel Prime Search | 0 | 2010-05-22 01:17 |
| 100M digit prime | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 10 | 2010-03-24 20:16 |