![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
Aug 2008
8610 Posts |
Pointless? So what?
2018 is my guess. It may not seem like there is much of a need for large multicores CPUs, but if it is possible, it will happen. One of my postdoc friends is studying methods of making use of many cores without imposing a large burden on the software developers, and I'm sure that there are many of other researchers looking at this also. The two big applications that have the most to gain from processing power is games and video processing. Games will always be pushing the bleeding edge, and homemade videos (for greeting cards, invitations, etc) will become standard fare once there are better tools available for it. Last fiddled with by uigrad on 2008-09-16 at 01:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
140648 Posts |
I don't see the utility of a poll. It is not a popularity contest and it would limit what can be selected to just a few options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
39316 Posts |
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
24318 Posts |
When I retire in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
http://primes.utm.edu/notes/by_year.html#3
If you just look at the GIMPS era, you will see that the data is best fitted by a curve resembling exponential saturation well below 100M digits. GIMPS may well struggle to maintain an advance of 20 M in the wavefront every 5 years. That is why I voted for >2026 in the poll. Of course it doesn't have to be GIMPS or even a Mersenne, but an unexpected twist will be needed e,g, actually finding a use for a 100M digit prime! David |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
November 2010 using some kind of new primality test
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
May 2008
3×5×73 Posts |
2016
I predict a new, faster method of proving the composite-ness of k*b^n±c will be found that will increase the rate of eliminating composites. A 100M digit prime number (whether Mersenne or not) shall be found by 2016 using LLT on the candidates which failed the faster composite test. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
230708 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Oct 2008
n00bville
23·7·13 Posts |
On my Q6600 quad core it predicts the end of checking in 2015 (not that bad either). I think in 2009 you have some cheaper Oct-Core so you could move it to 2013 (keep Moore´s law in mind).
If I would be really rich I would playing around with one of these new 2 x 8 core (32 ht) machines and would try it out ;o). The main problem is that in 2013 150.000 USD have the value of two pizza´s and one coke - but it would be fun anyway.
Last fiddled with by joblack on 2008-10-17 at 00:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |||
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
22×1,549 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So still some guesses going as far as 2026. Do those posters still consider that date likely? |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CPU time for 100M digit prime test | biggerben | Software | 7 | 2014-10-24 05:47 |
| I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... | JuanTutors | PrimeNet | 8 | 2012-12-06 13:47 |
| What minimum exponent would give 100M digit prime? | odin | Software | 7 | 2010-04-18 13:57 |
| 100M digit prime | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 10 | 2010-03-24 20:16 |
| M43 discovery date | Prime95 | Lounge | 55 | 2006-01-30 19:51 |