mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-09-09, 04:31   #1
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

2×5×239 Posts
Default using server chips in desktops = a bad idea?

This is a very dumb question, but is it OK to use server chips in desktop computers?

Some people are saying that it's safe to use a server chip in a desktop, but others are saying that doing so voids the warranty and that it could lead to problems. I've also heard that server chips are generally incompatible with desktop motherboards, which need to be replaced first.

Since server chips are generally faster and more durable than their desktop counterparts, they can be quite useful for number crunching.

Has anyone here ever used a server chip in a desktop?

Also, has anyone here ever used a server as a desktop (or a workstation)?
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-09, 05:33   #2
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

36×13 Posts
Default

I am using a server as a desktop. It sucks. No chance to OC from BIOS, and memory is very rigid, even though (or rather because) it is ECC. And it is PC2-6400.

It is a dual-quad-core E5345 and the bus contention (for 8 LLs) is terrible. My home Q6600 (which is about 10 times cheaper, but built from my pocket; it has PC2-8500, though) beats it in overall productivity.

--Serge
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-09, 05:36   #3
IronBits
I ♥ BOINC!
 
IronBits's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)

3·7·53 Posts
Default

It makes no difference for warranty, Server vs Desktop (case). How would they know?
Generally speaking, a CPU designed for Servers usually require sockets that are found on more expensive motherboards and ram requirements are usually of the ECC type which are more expensive.
Using a Server as a workstation is done all the time and there is no downside, other than cost.
It would never void a warranty. Server motherboards usually have very limited overclocking abilities.
Correct that CPUs for Servers are not compatible with normal motherboards because of the socket, but, workstation class motherboards only have a single socket whereas a Server motherboard can have multiple sockets, so using 4 core processors and a 4 socket motherboard, you could have 16 cores in a single computer.
Not sure about faster, but they are generally more reliable seeing that they are 'hand picked' for quality.
If you spend all your time doing video stuff, and your using a top of the line software package that can use multiple processor/cores, having as many as you can get into a 'workstation' with lots of memory (another plus of using a Server class motherboard, they hold more memory) the quicker you can get the work done.
Yes I have and I'll use anything as a Desktop or as a cruncher if the price is right and performance is good.

Last fiddled with by IronBits on 2008-09-09 at 05:45
IronBits is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows 10 in Ubuntu, good idea, bad idea, or...? jasong jasong 8 2017-04-07 00:23
Intel i7-980X (among other chips) launched ixfd64 Hardware 38 2010-08-25 12:26
AMD's new chips tha Hardware 19 2007-11-19 17:06
My prediction about multi-core chips jasong Hardware 6 2006-02-14 16:07
Upcoming INTEL chips????? georgekh Hardware 28 2004-11-20 03:53

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:51.


Sat Jul 17 04:51:51 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 2:39, 1 user, load averages: 1.82, 1.92, 2.05

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.