![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
74 Posts |
This may seem like a stupid question.
In the current version of PrimeNet, the summary page shows the number of exponents cleared (factored composites, L-L tests, and double checks) since the last server synchronization. The text "Prime, UNVERIFIED" appears when a prime is reported to the server. However, the v5 summary page doesn't seem to show this data. How are we going to see if new primes are reported once v5 replaces v4? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
A very good question, but remember that the server hasn't synced between the two yet, so we don't really know if it has one but is just hidden right now because it knows of no unverified primes. Maybe it will appear under the P column in the correct exponent range (hey, I hope so, it'd make guessing a lot more precise
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
1E0C16 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
As I wrote in the "Batman!" thread, the best way to keep a secret is to keep it secret, not to make a public announcement that the secret exists. Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2008-08-29 at 20:32 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
240110 Posts |
Well, speculating is part of the fun of discovering a new prime, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10AB16 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
However, note that such a request is unlikely to be granted if: (a) you have no special or useful qualification (not just mere curiosity and impatience), such as being a previous Mersenne discoverer or being able to materially contribute to the verification effort, or (b) you have a previous history of openly complaining about the secrecy expected from that group's members. I'd love to be in that select group, but I have nothing to contribute to verification efforts, and am not already a Mersenne discoverer. Furthermore, I'd rather not have the emotional strain of keeping the secret. I can't let the secret slip if I don't know the secret in the first place! Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2008-08-29 at 20:59 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
22×32×173 Posts |
I wouldn't want to join the insider's group. I find it much more interesting to not know and thus try to figure things out. Doing the puzzles is more fun than reading the answers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
96116 Posts |
Scott, any word on this?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mersenne Primes p which are in a set of twin primes is finite? | carpetpool | Miscellaneous Math | 3 | 2017-08-10 13:47 |
| Distribution of Mersenne primes before and after couples of primes found | emily | Math | 34 | 2017-07-16 18:44 |
| Conjecture about Mersenne primes and non-primes v2 | Mickey1 | Miscellaneous Math | 1 | 2013-05-30 12:32 |
| A conjecture about Mersenne primes and non-primes | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 0 | 2011-01-31 15:41 |
| possible primes (real primes & poss.prime products) | troels munkner | Miscellaneous Math | 4 | 2006-06-02 08:35 |